The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
John Mason
Some people will keep copies of their original application forms and so on, but many will not. We have heard of an example in which somebody who wanted to make a redetermination request asked for a copy of their completed application form but had difficulty getting it. Would that be just a one-off? Would people normally be able to get the original application form?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
John Mason
It is good to get that on the record.
I realise that I have put all my questions to Ms Devlin. Do the other witnesses want to come in on whether what is in the legislation is too specific or there is a bit of flexibility?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
John Mason
Okay.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
I accept that it is difficult. We are trying to strike a balance and not go to the extreme either of being too harsh or of being too easy going.
I wonder about the purpose of the audit. Audit was part of my training. If I was auditing Marks and Spencer, I would go in there and look at its systems, and if I found that it had been selling shirts for the wrong price, I would tick it off and that would go in the audit report. However, I would not go to the customer and ask them to give me the extra £10 that they did not pay for that shirt. If the purpose is to audit how Social Security Scotland is doing, that is fine—let us do that. However, it seems just to move on.
I would like some reassurance that what I describe is not going to happen. It seems to be a bit harsh that someone who has been through a bad experience in the first place would have their benefits cut simply because they had not engaged. As we have heard, some people will have been through a process of appealing to get the benefits that they are due. If it is simply the case that they have not responded and have done nothing wrong—or rather, that we do not know that they have done anything wrong—it would seem to be a bit harsh for them to have their benefits cut.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
That was a very full and helpful answer.
Am I right in thinking that part 6 of the bill was not consulted on when the bill was being prepared?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
I echo what Bob Doris has said. I was somewhat taken aback by how many people had applied to be the chair and commissioners; there seems to have been a very high level of applicants. I am also convinced that the process of sifting applicants down first to a short leet and then to the final nominees—who, as Bob Doris has said, seem to cover a wide range of ground—has been thorough. Therefore, I am happy to go ahead with the appointments.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
Cabinet secretary, you might have picked up the feeling about audit from the evidence that we have taken. The overall feeling is that although, on the whole, we have introduced a social security system in Scotland that is considerably more caring, adaptable and flexible than that which was previously seen at the UK level, when it comes to the audit, some of the expectations seem to be quite harsh. Could you comment on that, to start with?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
Did you say in your opening statement that you are open to, or are thinking about, stage 2 amendments in that regard? Did I pick that up correctly?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
John Mason
In an interview referred to on page 54 of your report, the interviewee starts by saying,
“The current government is very enthusiastic about commissioners”,
but then makes the point that
“it’s becoming very confusing what a commissioner is”,
adding that
“the phrase commissioner is starting to lose its value in terms of what it is.”
Is it an issue that the term “commissioner” seems to mean a lot of different things in a lot of contexts?