The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
Yes. It is stuck everywhere, as I understand it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
I am still struggling a bit. I get that the policy intentions were always clear—you have already said that. That is fine, and I think that we are all agreed on that. The police knew the general policy intentions. However, is it the case that, although there was no new information in the detail of the bill that the police did not already know about, perhaps they got a new lawyer that Monday or something, and they looked at it and revised their position? You said that they revisited their position. Did they just have second thoughts, whereby they went away, slept on it and thought, “Oh! Maybe there are going to be costs here”? Was there nothing new in the bill that they did not already know about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
I know that we are not concentrating on one particular commissioner, but Adam Stachura has put his case for one. Older people are one of the most powerful political groups in the country. They have achieved the triple lock for pensions—I am aware of no other group with that kind of strength. Would older people not be one of the last groups that need a commissioner, given what they already have? It is very different for children, who have no vote and no voice.
How many commissioners do you think there should be? Would you put a limit on the number of them? If we had 100 commissioners, all their voices would be tiny.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
But so do people with autism and so do children.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
Is “equalities” not a better overall term?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
Let me press you a little on that. Is it inevitable that, when a commissioner is created, the first thing that they will ask for is more money for their sector, or can a commissioner look at the money that is being spent and say, “You could spend that same money better”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
I should have declared that I am one of them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
John Mason
The committee has struggled with that over the years. We could spend more money in any sector today and save money in year 25, but where do we get the money today?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
John Mason
We have covered a lot of ground already, but I would like to pursue the idea of merging organisations. This will probably apply more to the second panel than to you. To be simplistic, the two of you, Mr Hamilton and Dr Plastow, are both dealing with information, so why could you not be the one organisation? Yours is quite small, Dr Plastow, and you have said how difficult it is with a small number of staff and that one more or one fewer member of staff would make a huge difference to your budget. However, putting yourselves together would give a bit of flexibility, it would mean that you could save half a member of staff or that if somebody is off sick it is not such a big deal.
Similarly, Ms Johnston and Mr Bruce, merging your organisations has already been suggested. You are both looking at the same cases, so that is duplication. I accept that in your submissions you think that it is not duplication, but it is duplication because you are both looking at the same cases. Surely, at a time of pressure that is a way forward. Could you comment on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
John Mason
Are you not on a slightly smaller scale than them? They are dealing with thousands of cases.