The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
I return to some of the issues that have already been mentioned, especially the national insurance increase. As I understand it, you have placed quite a big emphasis on profits being squeezed and wages and jobs perhaps being reduced in future years, but you do not seem to put so much emphasis on the idea that prices might increase. If I was running a restaurant and charging £17 for a main course, why would I not just add £0.50 or £1 on to that? Some restaurant people have told me that that is what they do.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
They could put prices up on the Monday.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
That is helpful. The approach means that we treat borrowing in the same way whether it is for a physical asset, such as a new bridge, or just day-to-day expenditure.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
From your point of view, it makes a difference, obviously, because one of those items will create more of a return in the longer term, even though—I agree—it is not a definite, fixed economic return. Should we be thinking of those two kinds of debt separately?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
That is helpful. On a different subject, I am still trying to get my head around the letters, so could you explain PSNFL—public sector net financial liabilities—to me? I get that, if I was borrowing through a mortgage, you would look at my asset—my house—and the two would go together. In a sense, it makes sense to include financial assets, but physical assets are not included. I would have thought that borrowing money to build a road, a house or a school would be slightly different from borrowing to pay for teachers and nurses or other resource spending. Will you explain the logic of why that measure is used?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
John Mason
I appreciate it that you have unpacked that for me. You mentioned three years and five years. I wonder whether you have an opinion on that. We are to have a spending review, which is for three years, as I understand it, although there is also the five-year forecast period. Is there a right length of time for those things? Three years is quite short. Should the spending review be for longer?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
That is very kind, convener.
Along with Ross Greer, I have the privilege of being on the Education, Children and Young People Committee, so we have had a lot more background on the bill. I will press you a little more on capital spending, which the convener asked about. The education committee got the impression that some outdoor centres are really struggling and people’s expectations of them are rising. Some of the buildings were built in 1939—as it happens, I have stayed in some of those.
The current model seems to be that schools pay for only the running costs and that the capital funding for outdoor centres has to come from other sources. The centres are going around to trusts to beg for money and are fundraising and doing different things. I get the impression that some of the centres seem to be a little more successful than others, but that is to be expected. The suggestion was made that if an outdoor centre hits a major financial challenge, it may well close. The current funding model is working to an extent, but not hugely, and the councils have largely closed their centres. Surely, going forward, the model cannot continue, and some new money must come in on the capital side?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
You said that you want to be inclusive, and we all agree with that. On your previous point, we all probably agree with the concept. The question is whether we support the bill, largely because of the cost.
Centres in Scotland can cope with those with additional support needs to a certain extent, but there is no one centre that can cope with some of the neediest children. Would the plan be that, in the short term, those children would go to England?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
Would the alternative be to set up a fund of perhaps £10 million that was specifically for schools, children or outdoor centres to apply for to cover their costs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
John Mason
I am sure that we all agree with that.
How flexible would the funding be? Would it be available for things other than going to outdoor centres? For example, some children in the Highlands and Islands are very used to being outside because that is their normal life, so they would like to come to Glasgow and visit museums and so on. It has also been suggested elsewhere that the money could subsidise overseas trips. How flexible is the whole thing?