The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2601 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
Is it fair to say that there is a mixture? The bill will mean that some people have to spend an extra 15 or 20 minutes with somebody, and it might be even longer for others. For some people, it will take just a few seconds to ask them whether they have a house. Will it vary a lot?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
That would apply to GPs as well. It has been mentioned that it would be good to have GPs in there. Presumably, we could pay GPs to do it or employ a link worker or something like that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
The Government says that the intention is to not have everybody being referred to local authorities. The question is whether that can be achieved in practice. What else do we need in order to ensure successful implementation of the duties?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
I will build on what Mr Balfour said. Mr Mills, ALACHO’s submission talks about
“when the household themselves feel or understand themselves to be at risk of homelessness.”
Obviously, some people are worriers and come to me and others worried about homelessness. Other people are the opposite. They might realise that they have debt problems, but they do not really believe that they will be made homeless until the very last minute. Is that a problem?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
I am sorry, but if we do not have the money, we cannot build more houses, can we?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
I realise that we are short of time.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
I will build on what has been said and look at the financial memorandum. Do the witnesses feel that enough money has been set out for the extra duty that people will be taking on?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
The Government has said that it will provide guidance and training on things—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2024
John Mason
Ms Brunjes, would you like to be more specific and give us the figure that should be provided?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
John Mason
I apologise.
My last of these three amendments, amendment 35, is a little more straightforward. In an example where A contracts to sell land to B and when, before that first contract has completed, B contracts to sell that land to C, B can claim LBTT sub-sale development relief under schedule 10A to the 2013 act, provided that various conditions are met.
One condition is that the significant development for commercial purposes of the subject matter of the qualifying sub-sale will be completed within the relevant period. The “relevant period” is defined in paragraph 4(3) of schedule 10A as
“the period of 5 years from the date on which the first buyer entered into the qualifying sub-sale.”
The current drafting of paragraph 4(3) means that the end purchaser, C, has to complete significant development within five years of entering into a contract to purchase the land rather than within five years of the purchase being completed. In practice, development could not start until C owns the land, as C could not start development on land that it did not own. The amendment would therefore change the definition of “relevant period” so that the period of five years commences when C acquires the land, rather than from the date when B contracts to sell the land to C.
I hope that that is all clear to members.
Finally, moving back to amendment 32, there was some debate as to whether amendments 33 to 35 would be admissible, given the range of the bill, although the convener ruled that they are admissible. Therefore, amendment 32 was only a kind of cover or fallback position in case the Government did not accept amendments 33, 34 or 35. If the Government is willing to accept those amendments, I will seek to withdraw amendment 32. Thank you for your indulgence.
I move amendment 32.