Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2601 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

Is it fair to say that there is a mixture? The bill will mean that some people have to spend an extra 15 or 20 minutes with somebody, and it might be even longer for others. For some people, it will take just a few seconds to ask them whether they have a house. Will it vary a lot?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

That would apply to GPs as well. It has been mentioned that it would be good to have GPs in there. Presumably, we could pay GPs to do it or employ a link worker or something like that.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

The Government says that the intention is to not have everybody being referred to local authorities. The question is whether that can be achieved in practice. What else do we need in order to ensure successful implementation of the duties?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

I will build on what Mr Balfour said. Mr Mills, ALACHO’s submission talks about

“when the household themselves feel or understand themselves to be at risk of homelessness.”

Obviously, some people are worriers and come to me and others worried about homelessness. Other people are the opposite. They might realise that they have debt problems, but they do not really believe that they will be made homeless until the very last minute. Is that a problem?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

I am sorry, but if we do not have the money, we cannot build more houses, can we?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

I realise that we are short of time.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

I will build on what has been said and look at the financial memorandum. Do the witnesses feel that enough money has been set out for the extra duty that people will be taking on?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

The Government has said that it will provide guidance and training on things—

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 June 2024

John Mason

Ms Brunjes, would you like to be more specific and give us the figure that should be provided?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2024

John Mason

I apologise.

My last of these three amendments, amendment 35, is a little more straightforward. In an example where A contracts to sell land to B and when, before that first contract has completed, B contracts to sell that land to C, B can claim LBTT sub-sale development relief under schedule 10A to the 2013 act, provided that various conditions are met.

One condition is that the significant development for commercial purposes of the subject matter of the qualifying sub-sale will be completed within the relevant period. The “relevant period” is defined in paragraph 4(3) of schedule 10A as

“the period of 5 years from the date on which the first buyer entered into the qualifying sub-sale.”

The current drafting of paragraph 4(3) means that the end purchaser, C, has to complete significant development within five years of entering into a contract to purchase the land rather than within five years of the purchase being completed. In practice, development could not start until C owns the land, as C could not start development on land that it did not own. The amendment would therefore change the definition of “relevant period” so that the period of five years commences when C acquires the land, rather than from the date when B contracts to sell the land to C.

I hope that that is all clear to members.

Finally, moving back to amendment 32, there was some debate as to whether amendments 33 to 35 would be admissible, given the range of the bill, although the convener ruled that they are admissible. Therefore, amendment 32 was only a kind of cover or fallback position in case the Government did not accept amendments 33, 34 or 35. If the Government is willing to accept those amendments, I will seek to withdraw amendment 32. Thank you for your indulgence.

I move amendment 32.