The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Could you talk us through some of the figures and the percentages? I find them interesting, but I am not sure that I have fully got my head around them.
Paragraph 54 of the financial memorandum says that 31 per cent of
“referrals to community-based services were discharged before starting treatment”
and that of those
“79.3% (2,459) were discharged and recorded as treatment incomplete”
Various reasons are given for that. As I understand it, you hope to dig into the remaining 24 per cent of all treatment referrals and cut that percentage down. Is that broadly where you are going?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
I accept that it is not a huge amount out of the total Scottish budget. Unfortunately, however, that is said about a lot of things. Our colleague Liz Smith wants children to be able to go to outdoor centres, which is an extremely good idea but would cost another £30 million or £40 million. All those things add up and, somehow, we have to prioritise. Assuming that the £28 million or £38 million would come from the health budget, is it your argument that the provisions in the bill should be a higher priority than, say, hip replacements? If people were to wait a bit longer for hip replacements, would that be okay because we would be putting the money into this?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
I agree with all of that, and I am sure that the lead committee will be looking at that specific issue. However, we are looking at the money. You have said that I will disagree with your suggestion, but let us hear your suggestion as to where the £38 million will come from.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Well, given that that money—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
At the moment, the target is based on SIMD20.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
That is great—that is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
I do not want to go over the same issue again and again, but it seems to me that the problems with data sharing are not just to do with education—they exist across the board. During the Covid pandemic, we were told in the COVID-19 Committee that Scotland has some of the best data in the world but that researchers and people cannot access it. When I deal with individual constituents in my casework, I keep coming up against the barrier that organisations will not talk to me because they are so terrified of sharing something that they should not share. I do not know whether you can answer this, but is there a wider problem with the general data protection regulation? Has it gone too far?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
I will pursue that with someone else. I will find the right person.
There have been a lot of arguments against using SIMD as a measure. I quite like it because it is clear cut—you can draw a line on a map. I take other members’ points that there are poorer people who are not in the SIMD20 areas and there are richer people who are, but the measure is quite clear cut. It keeps a focus on the wider areas, such as my constituency in the east end of Glasgow, where it is clearly not just one or two families who are in deprivation; it is a lot of people. As has often been said, a poorer household will do better in a better-off area than a poorer household that is surrounded by other poorer households.
Should we continue to use SIMD but add in other factors as well? I think that that is where the commissioner was going last week—that we should still use SIMD as a headline measure but bring in more factors.
11:00Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
We have had a discussion about other measures, and my colleagues might want to go into that space. I assume that you are working on SIMD20 at the moment, but are you looking more widely?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
John Mason
Are you picking up that colleges and universities are struggling to do that because of financial pressures? We have had evidence that they would like to do more of that kind of thing, but that they just do not have the finances, partly because the fees have not gone up over the years.