The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2594 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
Surely the argument that something has been done for 150 years is hardly an argument when we are trying to revamp the Scottish education system to keep it going. Would the cabinet secretary not accept, based on what Mr Greer has said, that the process is not independent? The Crown is only doing things that the ministers recommend.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
It strikes me that, listening to Willie Rennie’s intervention—I obviously cannot intervene on him at the moment—part of the answer to that is surely related to the fact that the inspector could come before the education committee. Through the committee’s questioning, challenging and whatever, the inspector would have the opportunity to demonstrate their independence just by their attitude at the committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
I take the member’s point that we would like to think that committees are listened to outside these four walls. However, would putting that requirement in the bill—we have oodles of other legislation that does not have such a requirement—not create an imbalance or a danger that we are specifically saying that, in this case, a body should listen to the committee and that, in the case of every other piece of legislation, a body should not?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
Some of what you are saying seems to repeat what we have heard before: that is, that the culture of the SQA has been seriously flawed. We are all agreed on that point. As I have done before, I question whether that is about the structure or about making sure that the right people are in place.
My second point follows on from my previous intervention about setting up a new body, which would also require premises, staff, costs and so on. I would hope that Mr Ross would be in favour of simplifying the public sector landscape and cutting the number of civil servants, but this amendment seems to go in the opposite direction.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
I take Ross Greer’s point, but I go to many meetings—as, I am sure, he does—at which some groups are quite passive and just follow the lead, while others are more active. Is he really convinced that forcing the board to have a vote will suddenly switch it from being passive to being active?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
How long do you plan to go on tonight? I do not think that we will get through this by 9 o’clock.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
I take on board what the member said in response, but, from his argument and from my experience, it seems to be more the specific people who were involved who were not having regard to what the committee, or even, perhaps, the Government, said.
However, that is always a risk in almost every situation, and I have to wonder whether putting what is proposed in legislation is not overdoing things. I have a fear that the same could happen in other organisations—they could stop listening to Parliament. I just do not think that we can put this into all legislation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
Pam Duncan-Glancy said that amendments 261 and 271 require qualifications Scotland to comply with the learner charter and the teacher and practitioner charter, respectively. However, the amendments say that qualifications Scotland must comply with
“the expectations set out in”
the charters. Can she clarify the difference between complying with the charters and complying with the expectations set out in them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
John Mason
Does the member accept that it would be different if ministers had the power to take away some responsibility of the inspector, but that ministers having the ability to add something on surely does not affect the inspector’s independence?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
John Mason
I may go over some of the ground that the convener has already been over. The assumption is that it is a good thing to have a medium-term financial strategy and plans for the future. For example, the Scottish Fiscal Commission and the Office for Budget Responsibility look 50 years ahead. As has been said, we must balance the budget every year, but unexpected issues can come up. An example is the UK Government giving public sector workers a higher pay increase, which we must follow. Are you convinced that there is value in having a five-year plan?