The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
John Mason
Can you spell out the difference that it could have made if we had had better and more frequent medium-term financial strategies in the past few years? You mentioned capital projects and workforce planning. Where might it have made a difference to those things, as well as to other aspects in the future? There are many capital projects—we want to build more houses and dual the A9—but we will not know what the capital budget is, so can we plan ahead?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
John Mason
Okay. On a slightly different subject, you are a bit sceptical about the committees doing year-round work if they do not have enough information from the Government to do it. Can you expand on that? I am keen on the idea that the committees do work throughout the year in relation to the budget. For example, the Education, Children and Young People Committee has been looking at the situation at Dundee university, which has become quite a challenge. I see that as part of that committee’s budget work—it is not coming from the Government, it is coming from the circumstances and the situation around funding for universities. Do you not think that it is possible for the committees to do a lot of their budget work regardless of whether they get information from the Government?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
As the member has pointed out, everyone must have confidence in whatever we end up with. None of the suggestions today is perfect—that is agreed—but they are not even good enough to give confidence to everybody. Does he agree that we are not yet at the stage of agreeing on one of the options?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
Setting up a completely new body flies in the face of where Parliament seems to be going. The Finance and Public Administration Committee is especially keen on not setting up completely new bodies, as there is a considerable cost to that. Scotland is a small country, and we should surely be able to do things in a more simple way and have fewer public bodies rather than increase their number.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
The member gives different examples, but we also have good examples in the form of His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. Those are not legally separate organisations, but they are respected for their independence. Would he accept that it is possible, within one organisation, to have a degree of independence? A lot depends not on what is in the legislation but, as I think that we found with the SQA, on the people who are involved. If they perform, the system will work; if they do not, the system will not work.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
John Mason
Does Stephen Kerr accept that, although it is very easy to say that there is a problem—and we might all accept that there is—there is not a neat solution? Does he accept that, whatever we do in this situation, it will not be perfect? It might be a little better or worse than what we have at the moment, but there is no neat and tidy solution that ticks all the boxes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
I will continue on that theme and play devil’s advocate. As Liz Smith has pointed out, things can happen in the very short term, whether that be changes to employer national insurance contributions, welfare or American tariffs—or all of those things. Given that, is there any point in making five-year forecasts, let alone 50-year forecasts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
There is one final area that I want to touch on. Both the SFC and the OBR are thinking of doing more on the expenditure side in general, rather than just looking at tax forecasts and social security. I think that the OBR is further down that route. Would that be helpful? Is it a good idea?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
That is great. Thanks very much for your help.