The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I think that that was around November, which means that, despite all the scrutiny and discussion, you had not picked up on the problem any more quickly than the university court. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Another aspect of financial sustainability is that the SFC needs to identify at-risk institutions. My understanding is that it already has that ability, but that that will now be put into statute. The committee has looked specifically at the University of Dundee, where the SFC did not seem to pick up quickly that there was a problem. Does the bill go far enough in that area, or do we need to do more?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Do we leave it to the SFC to work out the regime? There seems to be an expectation that colleges and universities will come to the SFC to say that they have a problem, although, clearly, some of them have not done that in the past. On the other hand, the universities are saying, “You shouldn’t be interfering in parts of our work where the research is separately funded.” It seems to me that we need a balance somewhere.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I am not asking what happened; I am asking when you picked up that there was a serious problem.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
The University of Dundee has been mentioned today. The committee has discussed the issues there. When did you pick up on the serious problems at Dundee?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
I accept that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Would they not be admitted as if they were new employees starting on that date?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Will the member take an intervention?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
Okay—thanks.
Professor Seaton, you said that simplifying the landscape is a good thing, and I am certainly in favour of that. Are there risks to doing that? The SFC’s staff numbers will grow dramatically. Will it be hard for it to get right the balance between the university-college side and the apprenticeship side?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
John Mason
From some of the evidence that we have had, we get the impression that the relationship between Skills Development Scotland and business and industry has been quite good, but there is some nervousness in some circles that that will be disrupted. For example, the UK Fashion and Textile Association said:
“Historically, the SFC has been more focused around research and academia but if also taking over from SDS they need to hit the ground running in terms of being employer facing.”
Is there a concern that the SFC will struggle to have as good a relationship with industry as SDS has had?
Either of the witnesses can answer that.
09:30