The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
That helps me to understand the area a bit better. The colleges portray that they give better training in some ways, but is the main difference that it is very generalised, whereas your training is more specialised?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
Does the pay level for apprentices vary hugely around the country?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
I will leave it at that. I could ask you more, but thanks very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
Thanks, convener. I could probably go on longer.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
Ms Viswanathan, I think that you are involved in the SFC. Is that correct? You are on one of the committees. Does the SFC have the powers it needs to oversee the financial sustainability of universities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
I presume that it is also about whether a college is making sufficient adaptations to fit its income. I do not know about colleges, but we certainly get the impression that some universities have been more agile and have reacted more quickly to the drop in the number of overseas students. I realise that that is less of an issue for colleges, but I presume that it is about both of those things. Do you think that the SFC is proactive enough, or does it just sit back?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
Financial sustainability has been mentioned by one or two of the witnesses, so I will ask you about that. Section 9 of the bill states:
“The Council must secure the monitoring of the financial sustainability of post-16 education bodies.”
We were told that that happens at the moment; it is just being formalised. Paul Grice, does it happen at the moment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
You do not have to.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
There is quite a lot in there that I could pursue with you. The extra money that the SFC is getting for this apparently new legal duty is not very much. I think that, in a full year, it is between £16,000 and £110,000. That raises the question—and I suspect that the colleges would raise this as well—of what it actually does with the information. You said that the system may or may not be working in practice. In practice, is it very dependent on universities and colleges giving it the information? Is it proactive at all? Does the funding council come into the universities at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
John Mason
That is helpful. Thanks.
I just quoted the bit about the funding council having to “secure the monitoring”, whatever that means. There is also a bit about its being able to make recommendations and give guidance. Do you think that there needs to be something more solid in the bill?