The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2655 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
I am interested in paragraph 22 of the COSLA-CIPFA paper, which says that the Scottish child payment
“is an example of an intervention that addresses a symptom of poverty but not the cause.”
There has been a lot of support for the Scottish child payment, as well as for doubling or quadrupling it. If you are saying that we could use that money better, how do you think that we could do so?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
My next question is for all three witnesses and is about where we are going with council tax. Both of the written submissions make the point that we have been planning for quite a long time to replace council tax. Should we adapt council tax, or should we replace it and, if so, with what?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
I would like to return to a point that Ray Perman made, which was also in his submission. I think that you used the term “Barnett guarantee”. Some people have said that the Barnett formula has worked through the pandemic, and that that is what has given us the money that we have used. Are you suggesting that that was bypassed? Can you tell me what you mean by “Barnett guarantee”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 September 2021
John Mason
If a family is short of food or cannot afford to heat their house, the cash is pretty helpful, is it not?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
One of my main concerns is ensuring that delegates from poorer countries are not going to be disadvantaged, as they are less likely to have had the vaccine, and I seek your reassurance that every effort will be made to treat every delegate fairly and that those from richer countries do not have an advantage in that respect.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
On a more general point, I think that there are three main vaccines that are being used in this country. Are we clear whether, as has been claimed by some people, they have no impact, some impact or different impacts on transmission of the virus? On a more international level, do some of the vaccines that people coming from overseas might have had affect whether they transmit the virus when they come here?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
John Mason
The convener’s line of questioning has got me thinking a bit. We have talked about people from here going overseas, but what about people who are coming here for the 26th United Nations climate change conference of the parties, or COP26? I assume that some of them will be in the complicated categories that Jason Leitch highlighted; they might have had a vaccination but have no certificate, for example, or they might be coming from, say, Russia and have had the Sputnik V vaccine, which I believe we have not approved. How will that work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I accept that.
Ms Walker, I did not ask you to respond to any of those questions, but you are more than welcome to. However, my first question for you follows on from what Liz Smith was asking about; indeed, you might already have answered it. You say in your submission that
“Prior to the ... pandemic, the Scottish Government had been considering methods of improving the tax policy-making process and the legislative processes for taxes”
and that you would like to see that worked through. Are you talking purely about a finance bill, or is there a bit more to it than that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
I have another question that is aimed at you, although Mr Robertson might want to come in, too. The voluntary sector has asked for multiyear funding, as it does every year, and a bit more predictability, which Mr Robertson mentioned. In practice—you are looking at the practical side of this—is it possible for any Government, whether a Westminster Government, the Scottish Government or even local government to make such a commitment and to adopt a multiyear approach, rather than the annual process that we have at the moment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
John Mason
Thank you. Again, I have a question that is primarily for Polly Tolley, unless either of the other two witnesses want to come in. Another of COSLA’s suggestions was that ring fencing should be removed and that we should give local authorities more flexibility in how they spend money. I know that that is an issue for citizens advice bureaux, because some of them get funding from local authorities and some do not. From a citizens advice point of view as well as from a wider point of view, do you have a view on whether we should make more decisions centrally in Parliament or leave more decisions to local government?