The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3572 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
I will build on some of the things that the convener has already asked about. I did not quite understand the split or the fact that some are an immediate choice—the retired people—and some are deferred choice. I think that the figures that we had previously were 2,800 out of 65,000 immediate choice had been resolved, and 56,000 out of 150,000 deferred choice had been resolved. However, we are told that the figure is now 110,000 has been resolved. How is that 110,000 split up between deferred and immediate choice?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
It is probable that none of us here will understand all the details, but does it require a very different skill set to focus in on that 30 per cent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
You said that some retired people are already on the best pension and some will get an improvement, but are there some people who have to pay back money? In this week’s 1919 magazine, there is an interview with three retired police officers who are having to pay money back, so the net effect is negative on them. Is that common?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
Okay, I think I am beginning to understand that bit. If you issue an RSS and people agree, within a couple of months they will be getting the correct payment and so on, whereas in other schemes—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
Even if 70 per cent are on the right pension, 30 per cent are on the wrong pension, so the 30 per cent of the retired people are the ones that it is really hitting right now.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
That is especially unfortunate for people who are in ill health, disabled or whatever.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
However, you think that that is quite a small number. Okay.
You have mentioned that this is part of a UK problem and that you are broadly in line with the other agencies. Again, that article from 1919 magazine suggests that some of the folk down south are further ahead. It might just be that individuals are further ahead rather than whole schemes, but is there any measurement of that? You have said that a certain percentage—85 per cent—of those police are sorted? Do we know how that compares with other police schemes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
The other area I want to touch on, which was raised by constituents as well, is the whole question of communication. Their feeling was that they had raised queries and did not get any response or it was very delayed. Has that improved or is that still a problem?
10:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
John Mason
Is that a one-off or does it happen regularly?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
Could the minister go into a bit more depth about where the line is on that? We all agree that we do not want universities to lose their separate status, but part of me thinks that it is a good excuse not to do anything with universities because we might be accused of interfering with them. Has the minister discussed that with the ONS or had advice? Is the minister clear about where the line is?