Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3697 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

John Mason

That is helpful—thank you. The proposed new schedule talks about “Full relief” and says:

“This paragraph applies to a land transaction if ... at least 90% of the chargeable consideration for the transaction is attributable to qualifying green freeport land”.

I wonder why it is 90 per cent. Why is it not 80 per cent or some other figure?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

John Mason

Thanks. That is helpful. I have a final question about point 5 in your submission. You refer to the 3.5 per cent pay increase that the convener mentioned and say that, if the Scottish Government does not reconsider that figure,

“real wages in Scotland are likely to fall further behind the UK.”

Is it your suggestion that, in Scotland, wages across the public sector or elsewhere are behind those in the UK?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

John Mason

In some sectors, Scottish workers are paid more than their equivalents in other parts of the UK.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

John Mason

I appreciate your comments. That is something that we are currently looking at. I realise that you did not anticipate the question, so asking it was maybe a little unfair.

It is clear that one of the roles that you and your colleagues have is to defend existing jobs. However, in looking at reform, I suppose that I would like to see more workers on the front line and fewer sitting behind desks. Are you open to that kind of movement?

11:30  

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

Fair enough. Thanks, convener.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

I remember 15 per cent inflation. We just lived with that, but people are not used to it now. Do we have to accept that the same thing is likely to happen in the future and that we might see a bit of inflation coming but that it will be hard to predict how much?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

On landfill tax, the comment was made that incineration capacity was limited and uncertain. I do not know whether that was about machinery breaking down or what it was, but I assume that it meant that more had to be put into landfill when it should have been incinerated.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

That is a little bit disappointing, because, when you were at the committee previously, I got the impression that the RTI information would be the big answer and would give you a lot more clarity. Has it disappointed you a bit?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

Would seven years make a difference?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

John Mason

We have covered quite a lot of ground already. On the timeframe, five years seems quite short, Mr Melhuish. Even seven years seems quite short. Clyde Gateway, which is in my constituency, is looking at a 10-year timescale for filling up a development.

What are the risks on the timescale? Is it that nobody will be interested to start with because it is too short, or is there a danger that people walk away after the five years?