The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
That is great. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
Is that a regular interaction, or was that a one-off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
I am surprised that Michelle Thomson did not ask about this, but I was struck by the change in the male to female split of applicants that you have had. Your report says that 61.9 per cent of applicants did not identify as male, compared with 33 per cent the previous year. Did you do something that led to that change?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
I like the word “flexibility”, but other people might say that it equals risk. Last week, when Professor Heald was giving evidence to the committee, he made the point that, every time we take on a new power—broadly speaking, I want us to take on new powers—the risk increases, but there is no equivalent increase in our borrowing powers and so on to cover that risk. I accept that this particular case is tiny in the scheme of things, so I am not worried about it, but I wonder what your thinking is. As we take on aggregates tax, air passenger duty and so on, does the UK Government understand that? Are you putting the argument to the UK Government that the fiscal framework has to change?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
John Mason
Even though it is one little thing, it seems to be part of a longer-term trend.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
Cabinet secretary, you mentioned in your statement today the figure of a £70 million increase for colleges, and the convener has repeated that. Can you explain where that £70 million comes from?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
It was not at all clear. Actually, it was impossible to work out—SPICe and I looked at the original figures and they just were not there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
One example from a few years ago is the family nurse partnership programme. That is perhaps more of a health thing, but if a kid gets a good start in life, it will affect them when they come to primary school, secondary school and so on.
Is it impossible or is it easy to split what is preventative spend from what is reactive spend? At primary school, to some extent, you are reacting to what has already happened to the kid before they got to school, but you are also preparing them for secondary school and beyond.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
There was no way that anyone could work out that £70 million figure until SPICe asked the Government to give an explanation.
I am not querying your figures. However, we used to think that there were two categories: resource spending and capital spending. Now, we have three categories: core capital, special capital and resource.
I accept that the Dunfermline learning campus was unusual—at £30-odd million, that is a big spend in the education budget. However, in terms of overall Government spend—it is spending £200 million on A9 for example—£30 million is not that big. On the £70 million figure, we are comparing the core capital and the resource against the core capital and the resource, and we are ignoring the Dunfermline campus.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
John Mason
Okay. I think that I have given that enough of a shot. However, I make the comment that I still find it odd that, everywhere else, there is just one figure for capital, whereas here a split seems to have been made between core capital and other capital. I find that very strange.