The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3261 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
That is okay. I get that you do not want to commit.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Okay.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Just to follow up, one of the changes between the financial memorandum and the letter from the Government was £4 million for information technology. That was not there at all in the financial memorandum, and then it suddenly appeared. Presumably, that is joint between the SFC and SDS? I know that that is not our main subject today, but can you say anything about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
I think that it said that it was assumed that a normal upgrade would cover the IT.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Thanks.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
We are wandering around and asking each other’s questions today, so it is a bit of a muddle. However, on the bill, I agreed with your point in your intervention on me in last week’s stage 1 debate, convener. Either the Education, Children and Young People Committee or the Finance and Public Administration Committee—Mr Greer and I are on both of them—should look at the financial memorandum and the subsequent letter from the Scottish Government that came in September. It is probably not your decision, minister. I assume that it is for the committees to decide between them which of them should do that and I flagged that up at the finance committee yesterday.
Along with the budget, we are due to get the Scottish spending review, which will look further ahead—about five years or thereabouts—for all sectors. Can you give us any indication, minister, on how much detail will be in that for colleges and universities? Will it help them to plan ahead because the Government is giving more of an indication on the funding?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
The finance committee and others thought that we might have got a little bit more detail in the medium-term financial strategy. Given that we did not, we are hoping—certainly, I am—that the Scottish spending review will not be too high level and we will get a bit more detail in that. However, I am happy to give you as much space as you want.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Although this section of questioning was meant to be on universities, we seem to be combining universities and colleges. It is difficult not to refer to the University of Dundee, but we get the impression that some universities and colleges are a bit more aware than others of their responsibilities under your code of good governance, financial memoranda and conditions of funding documents. We had Paul Grice from Queen Margaret University before us. That university seems to tick all the boxes, as far as I could see; however, other colleges and universities clearly do not.
The question has come up about how proactive the SFC should be. Should it believe the form that comes in or should it go out to meet the institutions? You have referred to the external governance effectiveness review—GER—which is long overdue for some institutions. Will you tell us a bit more about how you interact with colleges and universities?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
Does that help you to pick up if there is a problem at a particular institution?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
John Mason
That has not been happening at all in some cases, by the sound of it.