The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2867 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
But if there is a positive in one area, such as social security, and a negative in tax, it sounds as though it is to our advantage that they are not netted off against each other. Is there a logic to them not being netted off against each other?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Okay. I will leave it at that. Thanks, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
So we have all the information. I think that the report suggests that you have better information from Westminster this time than you have had in the past, which has allowed you to be a bit more accurate.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
We have had the slightly overused image of landing a jumbo on a postage stamp to balance the budget. It seems to me that this year is probably the tightest that it has ever been. For example, paragraph 117 of the report says:
“These movements ... leave the overall resource position as slightly over-allocated by an amount of £10.2 million.”
In the scheme of things, that is tiny. Are we currently expecting a complete balance, or maybe a little surplus, on reaching the end of the year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
That is great.
On the slightly more technical side of things, paragraph 138 mentions the allocation of the ScotWind funds. I was a little confused, as it mentions
“a contingency option for balancing the 2022-23 budget”,
but it goes on to say that, if that is not needed, it will free up funding for the future. Why is there scope for moving that funding between years? Is there something special about the ScotWind funding?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
But we are not facing a big problem that we are aware of at this stage.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
John Mason
Can I ask about Devon, Dr Strain? Are the GPs there more consistent in their approach than is the case in Scotland?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
John Mason
Who would take the lead on setting that up?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
John Mason
Is there anything else that any of you think we should consider that we have not asked you about?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
John Mason
Thank you, convener—I am pleased to take part in the session. For interest, I note that my constituency is in the east end of Glasgow, which is generally seen as one of the poorer areas of Scotland.
I will build on some of the previous questions. GPs have been mentioned quite a lot, and the theme of my questions is how we share learning. I get the impression, certainly in Scotland, that one or two GPs are specialising in long Covid and are into it 100 per cent, while other GPs are clearly less familiar with it.
We can start with GPs—and perhaps start in London—and then move on to other aspects. How does that work in practice? Are GPs being given information from the top down, or do they share it with each other? Is there a consistent approach to informing GPs?