The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I think that it was he who raised the point, but I cannot remember exactly.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I do not want to get into too much detail—I just want an overall view.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I certainly hope that that is the case. Sometimes, personalities come into these things, as we have discussed previously on other subjects. Is our system robust enough to ensure that, whoever the chairs of colleges are, it can still work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
Yes—we would expect internal and external audit to be involved in that process for the universities, so I will be very interested to see what the report comes out with.
On financial sustainability, we are thinking mainly about universities and colleges, but what about other training providers, such as those in the private sector? Is there any need to oversee them and look at their financial sustainability, or can we simply rely on the private sector to look after that aspect?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
So, broadly, you would have more confidence in a bigger organisation than in a smaller one.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
Okay—I am happy to leave it at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I welcome the draft order. I think that it is great that we will get rid of the Glasgow Colleges Regional Board, and I am delighted that the three colleges will be separate. Can the minister say anything about collaboration between the three colleges going forward? Although I want the colleges to be independent, they will need to work together to some extent.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
The convener has already raised a number of issues in the financial area, and that is where I want to go. The Parliament’s website says that a financial memorandum
“should set out best estimates of the costs, savings, and changes to revenues arising from a Bill.”
However, as I understand it from Mr Mott, we do not have an estimate of the pension costs. Does that mean that you are failing to give what is normally expected from a financial memorandum?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
I am not here to speak for the Finance and Public Administration Committee—Mr Greer and I are on both committees—but we absolutely support the simplification of the landscape as part of our public reform work, and we do not want there to be more public bodies. If we are simplifying things, I am absolutely on board and will totally support you on that, but we still have to look at the costs. The finance committee took evidence but did not have time to go into any detail with witnesses on that, which is why I am concerned about it.
Are you looking at whether the SFC would continue with two different pension schemes, or do you assume that it would go ahead and provide the better pension scheme for everyone?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
John Mason
If the SFC needs more powers, I, for one, am open to giving it those powers now.
I take your point that a lot of the income of universities, in particular, does not come from the public purse. On the other hand, if a university gets into difficulty, it expects the public purse to bail it out, so there is quite a big risk. I fully accept that we have to get the report in due course.