The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2623 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
You are quite keen on long Covid clinics, about which it would be fair to say that we have had mixed evidence. For example, we have heard that they are extremely costly per patient and that people with other conditions might be diverted away from GPs to long Covid clinics, so other illnesses could be missed. Are GPs key to all of this? In England, GPs refer people to long Covid clinics, so they are the key people.
10:30COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
Right. I will come to Dr Scott next.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
Okay. I have a question for Dr Scott, but I think that she wants to comment on the previous question first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Right—so it is the actual sum rather than the amount of interest. I find that confusing. Most things are fixed—they are either in this year or next year, and there is no flexibility to move them around. I was a bit puzzled about why there is flexibility in that area.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Okay—fair enough.
The last issue relates to the technical agreement on resource borrowing limits, which is mentioned in annex D. I understand that there has been further work with the UK Government on when we could and could not borrow. Some of that is quite technical. I understand that, within a particular tax, we net off—I see that the minister is smiling so, obviously, I am in a difficult area—the pluses and the minuses, but we do not net them off between tax and social security. Can you explain that a little?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Just to clarify, I should say that, despite what the convener has said, I fully accept that a lot of this is technical, and I do not necessarily get very excited about it. When I see words and phrases such as “non-cash”, “estimates”, “economists”, “current macroeconomic climate” and “impairment”, I take it all with a little pinch of salt.
I do not have a lot of questions. However, I note that the UK budget is coming up next week, and it will be focused on 2023-24. Is there any risk to our current year from next week’s statement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
But if there is a positive in one area, such as social security, and a negative in tax, it sounds as though it is to our advantage that they are not netted off against each other. Is there a logic to them not being netted off against each other?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
Okay. I will leave it at that. Thanks, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
So we have all the information. I think that the report suggests that you have better information from Westminster this time than you have had in the past, which has allowed you to be a bit more accurate.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
John Mason
We have had the slightly overused image of landing a jumbo on a postage stamp to balance the budget. It seems to me that this year is probably the tightest that it has ever been. For example, paragraph 117 of the report says:
“These movements ... leave the overall resource position as slightly over-allocated by an amount of £10.2 million.”
In the scheme of things, that is tiny. Are we currently expecting a complete balance, or maybe a little surplus, on reaching the end of the year?