The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2623 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
John Mason
Professor Cairney, your paper is full of contrasts or, some would say, paradoxes. Colleagues have mentioned a few, and I will mention a few more.
Under the heading “Fostering equity, fairness, or justice”, you talk about the focus
“on efficiency, using economic tools … to identify how to produce the highest benefits from the same costs”,
but you say that policy
“should also prioritise the fair distribution of costs and benefits.”
Is it not possible to be efficient and fair?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2023
John Mason
That touches on one of the other issues that I want to raise, which is mentioned later in your report. It concerns the idea of decentralisation, flexibility, collaborative working and all those sorts of things, as against setting a clear ambition for national accountability.
I suppose that I would feel that that is the case; you can either go too far one way or too far the other. If there is a clear, driving ambition from central Government, that means that local government and everyone else will get squashed. On the other hand, however, if you allow local government—or local health boards or local anything—to do whatever it wants, there is no coherence to that. I feel that, ultimately, that is impossible to square.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
I was going to ask what your timescale is for that.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
I will continue Brian Whittle’s line of questioning. We have heard different evidence from down south. Is one of the problems that some GPs are not familiar with the codes, which is why they are going through the free text route? I am not a medic or a scientist, so will you explain what free text is?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
On the point about face-to-face meetings with people, does that vary between different health boards in Scotland? Do some do more face-to-face meetings than others, or is it a national problem?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
I found your paper interesting. I confess that I did not understand some of it, but it is good. I will press you on the issue. What is the prevalence of long Covid? At one point in your paper, the figure of 1.8 per cent is mentioned, which would be, perhaps, 90,000 people.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
Lyme disease is an interesting example to bring up. As a hillwalker, I am always a bit wary of that.
I move on to some questions for Professor Duncan and Professor Cooper. Your paper suggests that GPs are reacting to long Covid in different ways. Are some of them wary of diagnosing people with it?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
Thanks for that. We could explore that further, but I have to stop as I have used up my time.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
The commonly used figure is about 170,000. Do you feel that that figure would be reasonable, if you are underestimating the prevalence?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
John Mason
That is fair—that is what we want to hear.
I will come to Dr Scott, but first I have another question for Professor Robertson. I was interested to see that more of the long Covid seems to have come from the alpha and delta variants, with less of it coming from omicron. Is that what you found?