The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3261 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Were all the victims in relation to the Queen Elizabeth university hospital and the Royal hospital for children and young people satisfied by the Scottish hospitals inquiry?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Okay. What about the victims in relation to the Vale of Leven hospital inquiry? Were they all satisfied?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
The police put forward the argument that public inquiries inform public debate. Is it not a problem when they go on for so long? Take the Edinburgh tram inquiry, for example. Did that end up helping the public? Did it help anyone, really?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You and I are both victims, in a sense—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You are highlighting a problem, but you are not advising that we should base the levy on value. It seems to me that, if an apartment flat in one place was sold for twice as much as an apartment flat in another place, the owner should pay twice as much levy. That would seem logical.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
You have mentioned that, when the cladding is looked at, a variety of other issues will come to light underneath the cladding, such as asbestos. In practice, how do you see the system working? If someone went to do the cladding work and discovered another problem, what would happen after that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Mr Drummond?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
Fair enough.
You said that all the different parties have to have lawyers. I wonder whether that is the case. Could we have a more inquisitorial approach and a less confrontational approach in public inquiries? I am also on the Education, Children and Young People Committee, which is looking into children’s hearings. There is a strong argument to be made that an inquisitorial approach should be taken in that system, with information being found out by asking the children and the families, rather than by the two parties having lawyers. Do you think that we could have public inquiries without having lawyers on both sides?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
I am sorry—can they not represent themselves?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
John Mason
But we are considering changing the statutory requirements, so none of that is fixed.