Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3360 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

Do you not have an alternative?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

That could take for ever. It could be in 50 years’ time.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

Did the developer have no responsibility to check the materials that it was using?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

I will come back to Ms Jackson. Can you say what we should do if we do not do the levy? Also, surely, if a person is spending £1 million on a house, an extra £5,000 or £10,000 does not matter to them, so, surely, they should be paying a levy.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

Ms Johnson, you have been the most supportive of the levy so far this morning. Can you defend it? Would we not be better just adding 0.1p to income tax, say, which would mean that we were not targeting the building sector?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

John Mason

But are you against the levy?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

John Mason

It sounds good to have a bit more informal contact, understanding, relationships and all that kind of stuff. However, the reporter will still have to write a report, will they not?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

John Mason

I have a slightly wider question on the bill’s financial memorandum. Pam Duncan-Glancy and others have touched on aspects of that already.

As I understand it, the three big bits of money are for extending aftercare, for increasing advocacy services and for children’s hearings, the latter of which is primarily about paying the chairs.

How comfortable are you with the figures? I am looking at the final column, covering the year 2029-30, by which time everything should have settled down and stabilised. There is a figure of £7.4 million for aftercare. However, there seem to be a lot of questions about how much aftercare will be needed, because we cannot predict the demand. Similarly, there is between £5.3 million and £7.2 million for advocacy services. How certain are you of those figures?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

John Mason

Can you clarify what figures the local authorities gave you? Did they represent what they currently spend on aftercare or what they think they might spend on it in future?

Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]

Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

John Mason

We have had evidence to suggest that the area of grounds hearings and the role of the reporter is becoming quite complex. Sheriff Mackie said that grounds hearings can become very difficult and confrontational and that cases in which grounds are not opposed would best be dealt with by a system that was more administrative, which would avoid the need for a hearing. Do you agree? Is that a possibility?