The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2700 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
John Mason
Each?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
John Mason
Right, okay. Thanks very much. That is helpful. Ms Kenyon, do you want to comment on any of that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
John Mason
Professor Macdonald, you have twice mentioned research. I think that you were a little bit critical of the budget that the IIAC has and the fact that its members have to do so much at night and that kind of thing. As I understand it, the bill proposes £30,000 a year as a research budget. I am new to this committee and the subject, but that strikes me as a very small amount. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
John Mason
Can you give us a figure for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
The second of the bullet points on the Smith commission says:
“The devolved Scottish budget should benefit in full from policy decisions by the Scottish Government”.
Is the assumption there that, if Scotland varies from the rest of the UK, that is entirely Scotland’s responsibility and it is under our control, for better or for worse?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
You are saying that, having been at 129 per cent, rightly or wrongly, we are on a decline to 120 per cent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
Professor Spowage, as well as responding to that, could you also comment on where we are now with regard to Scotland-specific shocks?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
If there was a specific shock to particularly Scottish sectors such as tourism or food and drink, would that cause us a problem?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
At previous meeting, the Deputy First Minister told us that both Governments were having to make compromises. Do you see that the UK has made any compromises in this?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
John Mason
I am happy to come in on that subject, actually, because I was just going to make a comment. When VAT assignment was first announced, I thought that it would be a good thing, partly because, as David Phillips explained, there are different models. I assumed that, if we attracted a factory to Scotland, that factory would add value. The whole point of VAT is that it is a tax on added value, so attracting more factories—and we have been quite successful at inward investment—would allow us to build up VAT in that way.
However, as we heard in the briefing this morning, clearly, that is not the model that is being looked at. It is purely about the end point where consumers spend their money. Like everyone else—I agree with what Michael Marra said—I am very sceptical about this going ahead as it is. I am not quite as sceptical as Charlotte Barbour, who said that it would be horrendous to devolve VAT. Clearly, other small countries—not just sub-nations but Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and Denmark—all operate their own systems, I assume, even though they are in a single market. It should be possible to devolve it and then, as and when we become independent, we will have our own VAT system. That is not unmanageable, but I accept that, at the moment, the costs are probably outweighing the advantages.