The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3369 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
That is helpful.
A related issue is how children and young people can be involved. The point was made that the whole system can be very adult centred and, obviously, most of the people in the system will be adults, so how do children fit in? We had slightly conflicting evidence on that. I do not think that people want the learner interest committee to be taken over by children, but do you have thoughts about how children’s voices can be heard? For example, one child at a committee would find that quite difficult.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
I know that you do not want to be too specific in the bill, and I broadly agree with that, but do you envisage there being another group, made up entirely of young people, that discusses some of the issues and feeds that into the learner interest committee? Is that a possibility?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
Following on from that and Liam Kerr’s question, I note that Mr Kerr asked about on-going costs, but we were also told that the reform team that was set up to specifically look at the changes was stopped in March, because of a lack of funding. Does something need to happen in that space?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
No—I do not know whether that was a good phrase.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
You mentioned the learner interest committee. Will there definitely be a parent voice on that committee?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
John Mason
Okay, but the legislation sets out that there should be a qualifications Scotland staff member on the committee. Why is that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
John Mason
I do not know what else Ross Greer was going to ask you earlier about the national performance framework, but can you tell us how that impacts the budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
John Mason
I understand that it has a general impact, but would the national performance framework have an impact when there is limited capital spending and you have to make choices—if you have to prioritise between housing and roads, say?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
John Mason
We will be going into this with Kate Forbes later, but, yes, it would be an issue. However, I do not think that the programme for government referred to the national performance framework.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
John Mason
I will build on what the previous two questioners asked.
From listening to the evidence, I think that one issue seems to be that the national performance framework is so general. We are going up from 11 to 13 outcomes and, as you said, cabinet secretary, there can be clashes between different outcomes. I wonder whether that is part of the problem.
Does the national performance framework help us in making day-to-day decisions? I asked Shona Robison a similar question in the previous evidence session. If we have a limited capital budget and if we have to choose between roads and houses, or anything else, does the national performance framework help us to make that kind of decision? Alternatively, is it just a question of saying, “Houses are good, roads are good—so whatever”?