The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2594 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
I seem to remember that that was discussed at great length many years ago.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
On the broad trajectory, if I understood our briefing correctly, one of the points that was raised last week was that the increase in UK resource spending will reduce from 1.3 per cent to 1.2 per cent. That does not sound like very much, but those could be quite big numbers for Scotland and the UK.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
The fear is that the spending review is at too high a level.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
So, if 2022 is the standard that we are starting from, we want a fair bit more detail than that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
From memory, I think that you mentioned the Netherlands.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
We might come back to that in the second evidence session. I will leave it just now.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
My questions follow on from some of the things that Michelle Thomson asked about. There are between three and five commissioners, and you say that the scope is widening. Is between three and five the right number, or should we be looking at that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
That is something that we have to live with.
I already spoke about how we compare with other IFIs, if that is the right term. We have accepted that one in the Netherlands is not a good comparison, because it has more resources and the media takes a more in-depth interest in it. Do you compare yourselves to international organisations and do you do that at a national level or at what we might call a sub-state-level? Can you learn lessons from any of those groups?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 April 2025
John Mason
I will build on a few points that have already been made. Forgive me for being sceptical—and I think that I have said this before—but is there really a lot of point and can we have any faith in medium-term financial forecasts when things seem to be changing? Craig Hoy emphasised the elections, but it is not just about the elections, is it? In October, we had what was meant to be a major budget, a new Government and plans for the future, and then last week a fair chunk of it got changed.
Graeme, I think that you used the words “relatively stable”. Can we ever expect that to be the case or are we just going to put more and more resources into both your organisation’s forecasting and the Government’s making plans for the medium term only for the UK Government to change something major?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
John Mason
Do you think that the falling number is because of finance, in that people cannot afford to become foster carers? Is there too much bureaucracy? Is it a mixture of things?