The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2623 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
I am looking at the overall picture of the additional spend of £1.092 billion that we have to find. I think that I am right in saying that roughly half of that is the Scottish child payment, which is completely ours because they do not have that in the UK, and that another big chunk is the extra money for ADP. Is that correct? Are there other factors in there as well?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
So, they are kind of rolled into the Barnett formula.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
As you said in answer to previous questions, you are assuming that there will be no change in policy and that both the UK and Scotland will carry on with their current policies. I presume that our figures could be affected by either of those changing. If the UK Government changes its policy, we will have more—is that right?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
It is often said that, for both the UK Government and the Scottish Government, this is a demand-led area and that we cannot control it very much.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Mason
I will continue the questions on inflation. I am also on the Finance and Public Administration Committee, so I realise that you might have answered this question before. Professor Roy, in your opening remarks, you said that the cash increase for the whole Scottish budget was 2.6 per cent and that that was a real-terms increase of 0.9 per cent. The difference is 1.7 per cent, so can you explain that figure of 1.7 per cent? We are putting benefits up by 6.7 per cent; can you confirm whether Westminster is doing the same?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
John Mason
The Colleges Scotland paper talks about “repurposing existing resources”. Can you tell us what that means? Does that mean cutting funding for the universities and for richer universities especially?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
John Mason
Sorry to interrupt you. Does that mean that if the SFC was overoptimistic, by mistake or whatever, that would lead to a very negative reconciliation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
John Mason
Mr Birt, if you want to comment on any of that, you can, but I was going to move on to the council tax freeze. I picked up that you are not all that enthusiastic about it. Does the council tax freeze aim to achieve a target that you are aware of, or does anything good come out of the council tax freeze?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
John Mason
I want to follow up on what Martin Booth and Kirsten Hogg said about multiyear funding. Are local authorities and voluntary organisations looking for slightly different things? Presumably, it would make a big difference for Glasgow to know that a 5 per cent budget increase or decrease was coming down the road. We heard that for a voluntary organisation to know that it would be getting 50 per cent of its budget would not be very helpful. However, we have raised with the SCVO before the fact that, even if an organisation knew that it would get 50 per cent or 75 per cent of the budget allocation in the previous year, that would make a big difference, because it would not have to make people redundant. In that scenario, the organisation would at least know that it would be getting something. Are we talking about two slightly different things?