The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2881 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Yes, and yet it is the case for other professions. A teacher will have 50 minutes, or whatever, with a set of pupils, and they will do the best that they can in that time. As an accountant, I would have to do an audit within three months—or whatever it might be—for a fixed fee. Auditors are still—I think—considered to be independent. It seems to be possible to do that kind of thing, but it seems that when we get the legal profession involved, they do not like that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
You might or might not want to answer this—[Interruption.] Sorry—my microphone is not on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Could we pass new legislation on public inquiries that would override that act?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Somebody in an earlier evidence session said that there is a sweet spot when you have to question how much more money, effort and time is going to be put into the inquiry, and for what extra benefit.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Exactly. So, even if we expect more tax to come in, that does not help us in any way this year.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Yes, but that affected us negatively. However, I presume that if it affects us positively, we will take the money immediately.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Okay. You were asked about productivity and capital investment, and I want to press you on that. Is it the case that any capital investment will inevitably help productivity, or do you look at where the capital investment is going? For example, if we buy a new train, perhaps people’s comfort improves and things are a bit more reliable, but, actually, it is still moving 200 people from A to B, so it does not really increase productivity.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
Indeed. That is what I was thinking, too.
You suggested that, before an inquiry started, you could consult not just with the police, but with public bodies and anyone else who would be involved. Can you expand on what you mean by that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
The final issue that I want to ask you both about concerns the idea of who is satisfied with a public inquiry. Is it your feeling that the public, the victims, their families, or whoever is involved, or even the police, have been satisfied at the end of the public inquiries that we have had? I do not know about the Crown Office—it does not get satisfied, so to speak.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
John Mason
As I said, Mr McGowan, you might or might not want to answer this, but when I put the same question to Lord Hardie, he said that he just would not do it if those were the conditions.