The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3048 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
What about work on air departure tax?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
Might it be five years, or 10 years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
One part of the report says:
“The Scottish Government remains committed to fulfilling Smith recommendations”,
which includes VAT,
“but must also protect the Scottish budget from unnecessary levels of risk.”
That is fine, but I thought that you might have said, “We are forgetting VAT—we have agreed with the UK Government that that is not happening.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
It is helpful to get that clarification.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
Public sector reform has already been mentioned, and I think that the assumption of us all is that it will reduce the workforce, costs and so on.
Last week, we debated the Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. It moves things around, mainly from Skills Development Scotland to the Scottish Funding Council, and the financial memorandum says that it is going to cost £33 million. I was encouraged to find, last week, that that figure had come down to £22 million, but it still seems like a lot of money to rearrange the furniture and, indeed, seems to be going in the opposite direction of what we thought was going to happen, which was to reduce the number of public bodies, the workforce and so on.
How do those things tie together? Is the bill a bit of an outlier, or is it a sign of things to come?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
It is good that the £33 million has come down to £22 million, but everyone, including Mr Macpherson, has accepted that that is not the final figure and there are still some uncertainties.
Another interesting point that came up in the discussion on the bill is that, as Skills Development Scotland is losing or—I should say—transferring a lot of its work to the Scottish Funding Council, SDS subsequently plans to make some of its staff redundant, which will cost between £4 million and £8 million. That was a bit of a surprise as it was not in the financial memorandum, but it subsequently appeared in the Government’s letter responding to the stage 1 report.
It strikes me as slightly odd for an organisation to plan to transfer many of its staff who work on a specific task, which is apprenticeship funding, to then be left with too many staff at the end of the process. It is not your issue, cabinet secretary, but it makes me think that there are bits of the public sector that may have too many staff and where savings could be made, but that there are other areas where that does not apply.
I do not know whether you or Ivan McKee consider SDS to be a front-line service. Are we looking at making savings across the board, or do you feel, as I am beginning to, that there are more savings to be made in some areas than in others?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
That was a short answer to my question. I will move on to a few other points.
The convener has already asked you about the proceeds of crime. The fiscal framework outturn report and other documents note that discussions are on-going and that different things are still being looked at. One issue is the block grant adjustment for the aggregates tax—is that progressing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
That is exactly my point—the convener takes the words out of my mouth. I think that the cabinet secretary had indicated before that it would not happen, so I am surprised that it still features as a possibility in the report.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
That is helpful. We will look forward to what is coming.
As has already been noted, most committee members were in Lithuania last week, but those of us here had a good debate at stage 1 of the bill and a number of members agreed that either the Education, Children and Young People Committee or our committee needs to look at the financial memorandum more carefully.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
John Mason
That sounds good. It is encouraging that it is progressing. How about bonds? Are they still being looked at, and is that work progressing?