The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 818 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
I guess that there has been a disconnect between the expectation of what the engagement would look like in reality and what the unions took it to be. I contend that, when there have been developments in the process, we have engaged directly with the trade unions.
I also make the distinction between that engagement and the direct engagement that I have had with the staff. I have gone in front of the staff, updated them on where we are and answered any and all questions that they have had as openly as I can. It is a combination of things.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
This Government is absolutely committed to enhancing the apprenticeship offering in all its guises, whether it be, for example, modern apprenticeships or graduate apprenticeships. There is an absolute commitment. The apprenticeship offering is critical to the needs of the economy, and we are in the business of improving it.
As for your initial point, Mr Rennie, I would just caution that we should await the Pamela Gillies report on Dundee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
ONS classification pertains to universities.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
We do not know the exact quantum, but it will be in excess of 100 people.
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
Instead of apprenticeships being, as Andrew Mott has said, an add-on to the organisation, they will become a critical part of the SFC’s activities. The Government’s view is that there needs to be a growth in apprenticeships, both numerically and in quality.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
In that sense, it will—I cannot disagree with you on that. However—and I do not think that we can make this any clearer, convener—the new organisation will, in every respect, put a huge emphasis on apprenticeship delivery.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
If anything, we want to enhance business involvement across the gamut. You talked about careers. We need greater business input into the careers offering—that is a challenge to them. Skills planning has been enhanced—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
I do not accept that at all. In this instance, the work that has been done on skills planning would see the existing functions still sitting within those two organisations, with the Government taking an overarching lead. I do not think that anything would be pulled out. The careers service is about much more than SDS.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
All the component parts of the careers services collaborative need to do their bit. At the moment, there is a bit of a conflation that suggests that this is all about careers advisers in schools—far from it. All the work will come together with an overarching vision for the post-16 landscape. I do not accept that placing the responsibility for apprenticeships elsewhere would create the difficulty that you are suggesting.
The SFC already engages considerably and in a variety of ways with business. I fully accept the member’s point, but, since day 1 of the process, the team and I have been engaging directly with business. An employer group has been set up, which met a couple of weeks ago. In the first instance, it will look at apprenticeships, but its remit has been broadened beyond that. An apprenticeship committee will be provided for within the SFC, which will have a broader remit than the existing SDS committee, the SAAB.
Extensive work is being done. This is about making the offering better than it is currently. In the context of employer engagement and the SFC’s committee, some of the evidence that the committee has taken from various stakeholders on how we could expand that has been quite useful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graeme Dey
I suspect that SDS has looked—