The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1032 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
It sometimes takes time to get processes right, but my understanding is that the work is quite well progressed. We can write to the committee quickly with some more detail on that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
It is important to note that it is not a carte blanche power. It is restricted to very sensitive issues, and it is extremely narrow. The fact that it has not been used does not mean that it might not be required on issues of sensitivity. Our view is that, on balance, it should be retained.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
I will bring in Jill McPherson in a moment, because she is leading on that. There is an opportunity to make improvements outwith primary legislation—we are taking forward a number of matters in that way. However, there are aspects—which we may come on to—that will require primary legislation. If we had had more time for the bill, we could have used it as a vehicle to implement changes that might best be implemented.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
I had hoped to be able to say today that the consultation would commence next month. It might still commence next month. We are just dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s at the moment. If it is delayed into early January, that will be because of the festive season, but we are close to getting it done. I cannot give you a definitive answer, but I am happy to write to the committee as soon as we have a date.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
I guess that the answer to that is, “Potentially.” One concern that we have expressed is that it is not defined. It is very wide ranging. If some specificity was delivered on that, that might address our concerns.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
That is a fair assessment—I speak for an organisation that is actively in the proactive space. It is a good summary, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Not at all—I understand the perspective, and people have different perspectives on the matter. People might say, “Well, you would say this, wouldn’t you?”, but our position is to reflect on the merits of the proposals and to work through whether there could be any unintended consequences. The fact that the power has not been used up to now does not mean that, in the world that we live in—I am thinking of national security, for example—there might not be an instance in which its use was necessary. That is why we favour its retention.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
This is a layer of the overall protection.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Graeme Dey
Yes—if there is a significant issue to be dealt with and if it does not create practical issues.
There is perhaps a lack of knowledge of the processes that organisations have to follow, particularly with a complex request, to ascertain which part of the organisation might hold the information and can pull it together. I can understand the issue if someone who has requested information is contacted on day 17 and asked whether they can give further clarification. Perhaps they have started from a standpoint of great concern, so they will treat that request with suspicion. We are saying that there are often practical and understandable reasons why that has occurred.
We are not aware, anecdotally or through the network of contacts, that there is a significant issue. We just have to ensure that, if such a change is to be made, there will be no unintended consequences that might lead to poorer quality answers being provided simply to avoid falling foul of the process.