Seòmar agus comataidhean

We must first determine that that is the only route that we could take. None of the bills—given their parameters, taken at face value—would capture that. You will understand the risks of broadening out a bill at the last minute—it is not something that we think is viable.

I will bring in Clara Pirie on that.

You said a moment ago that, according to the individual who gave evidence, a lot of that work is now out of date. We would need to take account of that. I was reading a briefing on the findings the other day, and we could certainly base some of the consultation on that. I will take it away and think about reconvening the group. That might feed into the consultation. I am happy to engage further on that.

You and I had an exchange in the chamber a few weeks ago, did we not, when you reminded me about the commitment that had been made to look at the issue of disabled students?

We are open minded about the range of the consultation and I am happy to engage with you on that. The topic has been raised with regard to both the part-time element, which is a long-standing issue, and disabled students. The other week, I looked at the numbers for disabled students and there is a great variation among certain disabilities: for some, access to university is improving but one or two others are going back the way. I would like to understand why.

There are particular issues. Some long-serving members of the committee will remember its work on Ms Duncan-Glancy’s Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill, which we did when I was on the committee. A memorable piece of information was given to us by, I think, the University of St Andrews. The information was that, if a student does not have an unconditional offer from a university, it can be August before the student knows that they are going to that university and can engage with it. When a university has resources in place for disabled students, those are focused on the students that it already knows about, who are in years 2, 3 and 4. When new students present in August, their needs are often a surprise to the university. It scrambles to provide support and does not always achieve that. That stuck with me as we worked on the bill.

More and more disabled students are going to university, which is a positive, but are we doing enough to properly capture and provide the support that those students require? That is not just about student funding. I want to understand whether we are doing that. If we are not, what more do we need to do?

I think that I am right in saying that you have been looking to make amendments to the Housing (Scotland) Bill. That is a conversation for you to have with the minister who is overseeing that bill.

As I said a moment ago, we think that such a scheme would be prohibitively expensive in the current financial situation, but one of the problems is that it is difficult to quantify what uptake would be. That makes it all the harder to analyse. To be absolutely open, I note that it is unlikely that we are in a position to implement that scheme in the short term, although I recognise the ask.

I did not say that they were not an issue—

Some of the issues are similar to those that we have encountered with some of the other measures that we have looked at. It is about data sharing—that is the fundamental challenge that is effectively holding back some of the progress that we would like to make. It is because of the data-sharing platform that exists in Scotland—although “platform” is perhaps the wrong word. That is the impediment, but we are approaching all of this from the standpoint of how we can find a way to make it happen.

Do you mean for students in general or for widening-access students?

With respect, it is way above my pay grade to comment on the Government’s view of GDPR. To correct one thing, the issue is not the gathering of data. The data is gathered and held: it is sharing of data that is problematic.

I will give an example. If you share a certain data set, the attached risk is that you can share information about the individual, which is, by default, beyond what it is intended that the data be used for. I will not give specific examples. If a data set has been gathered using multiple sets of information and you are sharing that data for a particular purpose, are you, essentially, giving away more detail about an individual than they might want to be shared, or more than it is appropriate to share? That is one of the challenges in the issue.

We can do only what we are able to do. My enthusiasm for the measure is the same as that of other people’s, and that is the case for some of the other measures. I am frustrated at some of the barriers that we encounter, and we are actively looking at how we overcome them, because all the measures that are being talked about would be of huge benefit to us as we look to hit the target—and, more than that, just do the right thing. If we can implement it, we will do so. That is basically what I am saying to you.