The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1319 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
I do not expect you or your colleagues to know everything about the pollutants in every item, but it must be difficult to put together a circular economy strategy to the level that we want when we are sometimes unaware of the makeup of a particular product.
Let us move on to products where we are aware of such things. My understanding is that persistent organic pollutants—which, of course, can cause harm to human health and the environment—are contained in quite a lot of furniture and that more than 125,000 sofas per year would have to be incinerated in Scotland because of those pollutants. Is that the case? If so, how do we change the ingredients—the components—of products that have those pollutants in them?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
So it is all about plain, understandable language and messaging.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Before I move to my main line of questioning, I have a quick question. I often wonder whether people play back their committee appearances after they have appeared, because there are sometimes things that I think annoy the general public when we hear from folk. I will give you an example from earlier: there was a machine-gun rattle of acronyms. This may be a question for the chair. Does the board have a policy about using plain, understandable language that the public can get to grips with?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
You gave a politician’s answer there by not really answering the question to my satisfaction and moving on to other subjects. Are you going to put something in place policy-wise so that plain language that is understandable to the public is used rather than acronyms?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. Thank you. I should also point out that Scotland is not a region.
Let me move on to my main line of questioning, which is about persistent organic pollutants, forever chemicals and microplastics. I would like to know how all of this will fit into the circular economy strategy. I will start with microplastics. Many members of the public have no idea that there are microplastics in various products. For example, a large amount of the chewing gum on sale contains microplastics. What can be done to highlight that and, beyond that, to get those microplastics out of the system? I recognise that some of that will fall within reserved policy.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
I get your point, but I think that sometimes we complicate things. We want a circular economy, and we want to ensure that we do right for the future. Some of the leading changes over the decades have been consumer led. Why do we not make it simple in some of these cases and point out to consumers via labelling the harmful things that those products contain?
You talk about alternatives, but we already have them. Take microplastics, for example: I understand that many of the leading chewing gum brands are natural products with no microplastics in them. Of course, those products will not need warning labels. By buying them, consumers can help with the circular economy and create a better environment.
Mr Gulland, did you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
That was a very long answer, but basically you are saying, “Yes, let’s tell consumers what is in the products.”
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kevin Stewart
Many products have warnings on them. Indeed, cigarettes come with a huge number of warnings on the front of the packet. Should we have warnings on various products? Should we say, for example, that there are microplastics in this chewing gum or organic pollutants in that set of cushions?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am going to play devil’s advocate here. You can have as much money as you want and throw it at various things, but that does not necessarily lead to change. However, what can lead to a change in making folk think differently is when they see people like themselves aspire to particular careers.
Let us look at women in engineering—women welders. From my perspective, the best way to inspire young women to go into that is to hear from a young woman who is doing it. Do we have enough ambassadors out there promoting these careers and trying to persuade others that it is the right path for them?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Kevin Stewart
Very briefly, convener, because I asked this question last week—