The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1455 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Jamie, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. Some of you have already answered this question, but I would like a yes or no answer, please, for the record. Is it clear to you how the bill would interact with existing environmental legislation and regulation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Fine, thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
One of the previous witnesses said, and I paraphrase, that the bill would be the safety net at the outer limit of activity. Jonnie, am I right in saying that you are arguing that we maybe require to ensure that existing regulation and legislation is well known by the folks that you and others on the panel represent in order to get preventative measures in play?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
I would like to explore the key differences between the proposed offence and the existing offence of causing significant environmental harm in section 40 of the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. Why have there been so few prosecutions under section 40 of the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
It wouldnae come under the ecocide bill, because you are describing something in England and not in the Scottish jurisdiction. Let us hear from Mr Whittle, please.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will paraphrase something that you said earlier, Mr Whittle: you said that a change in the law would lead to culture change. I am quite long in the tooth in this place, and I have to say that changes in legislation do not automatically lead to culture change. What makes you think that the bill would lead to that culture change?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Was there culture change after the introduction of section 40 of the 2014 act? Is that the reason we are not seeing any prosecutions there?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Can we hear from Shivali Fifield, please?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you. That is helpful.
I am a very logical person when it comes to legislation, and I think that, sometimes, we take the most difficult paths to get to where we want to be. In that logical sense, would it not be wiser to, first of all, modernise the permitting system across the board and consider where section 40 is not working before we put in any further additions? I want to see Scotland keep up with our European partners in almost every aspect of life. However, logically in all of this, would it not be best to first deal with those matters that I have discussed before we move on?
Those items could probably be dealt with much more quickly than through a bill that is being discussed right at the tail end of a parliamentary session and that is unlikely to make progress. I am sorry for saying that, Monica, but that is the reality.