The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1043 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. On the implementation of the bill, what consideration has the member given to how the bill would operate in practice, and has he explored what duties and functions the Scottish Government would need to place on other bodies?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government is working to expand early years and childcare through early adopter community projects in six local authorities, some of which directly support children aged nine months. It is also working on a national improvement project that aims to seek out and promote good practice to increase uptake for eligible two-year-olds.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
There were probably no artificial sweeteners in my day either.
In light of the research, I wonder whether the committee will consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government will not consider taking steps to ban the sale of non-sugar sweeteners, given the views expressed by the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition that NSS are safe for human consumption, having undergone safety assessments by the European Food Safety Authority or by the UK Food Standards Agency, and that the Government will continue to monitor the evidence on NSS and to work with Food Standards Scotland, which is reviewing the SACN recommendations and assessing what they could mean for Scotland.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
In light of that evidence, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the NSC, on which the Scottish Government relies for advice, has considered that further work is required to ensure the feasibility of self-sampling in the current screening programme, and has indicated that various projects that will inform future recommendations are under way.
In closing the petition, the committee might wish to draw the petitioner’s attention to the response from the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to a recent written question on a similar topic.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
Considering that a lot of the petitioner’s asks have been met, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish ministerial code has been reviewed and updated, taking into account the main asks of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
In light of the Scottish Government’s response—and the fact that it will not, I think, be changing its mind on this—I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government is confident that one medical opinion is sufficient to grant a short-term detention certificate, because of the additional safeguards and patients’ rights that are provided for in the 2003 act.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. What are the challenges for the adult social care sector in relation to establishing a national negotiating body? What are the implications and potential risks of the provision that is contained in the LCM?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
David Torrance
It was mentioned that services are delivered locally and, in many cases, as Karen Hedge said, in remote areas. Will there be any conflict with representation from union reps at the local level? Would they be missed out of negotiations and would it be difficult to bring that local element into negotiations?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
David Torrance
I have no further questions, convener.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
David Torrance
How concerned are the witnesses that the bill’s focus on residential treatment could inadvertently deprioritise things such as community-based treatments and harm reduction strategies?