The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1320 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
In the light of the evidence, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that Police Scotland is working to align recording systems to capture ethnicity data for suspects; the issue of data collection is being considered in the work being done by the national child sexual abuse and exploitation strategic group; and the Scottish Government has committed to establishing a public inquiry into Scotland’s response to group-led child sexual abuse and exploitation.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has suggested that setting a timetable for delivery is dependent on the completion of preparatory work, including the approval of a relevant business case, and that it has indicated that work is still under way to determine the most suitable procurement option and to develop a business case. In addition, the publication date asked for in the petition is now obsolete.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
This petition has had substantial work done on it, not only by the committee but by the Deputy First Minister, but I still feel that there are avenues that we could explore. Therefore, it is one of the few petitions that I would like to be taken forward into the next session. My recommendation is that we keep the petition open into the next parliamentary session and that the next committee explores the most appropriate means of progressing its aims.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
The evidence is pretty sound that the UK National Screening Committee will not move its position, and the Government is sticking to what it is saying. I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the UK National Screening Committee’s draft recommendation is that population screening should not be recommended as a course of action.
Modelling work found that screening all men in the UK, regardless of their risk profile, might lead to a small reduction in the number of deaths from prostate cancer, but it would also result in substantial overdiagnosis, leading many men to undergo treatment that they do not need. It also found that, regardless of age, the level of predicted overdiagnosis means that screening is likely to do more harm than good.
The Scottish Government will also continue to consider recommendations from the UK National Screening Committee and will take appropriate action should its recommendations change.
In closing the petition, we could advise the petitioner, if nothing is taken forward, to bring the petition back to the new committee in the next session of the Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
I, too, am happy to keep the petition open.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
I fully agree with the suggestion that has been made. This is an issue that the committee in the next session of Parliament should explore and hear from both sides on. I have to say that I am not very hopeful about the representations from NatureScot, but I am quite happy for consideration of the petition to be continued in the next session.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, given the Scottish Government’s position that it would not be lawful to employ a policy of automatic exclusion without considering the individual circumstances of each case, given that the Government has no plans to change the law on exclusions, and given that the committee has undertaken detailed work on broader issues relating to violence among young people.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the petitioner, suggesting that she submits a new petition in the next session, in the light of the evidence received on this petition. A new petition could, for example, call for a presumption that automatic exclusion would be appropriate in extreme circumstances.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
David Torrance
I think that the petitioner has achieved her aims. I wonder whether we can now close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders on the basis that the Scottish Government has committed to establishing a public inquiry into Scotland’s response to group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
David Torrance
Good morning, everyone. What is the status of the public health priorities that were published in 2018, and what progress has been made against them?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
David Torrance
Is there a gap between evidence and practice in public health? Do we lack evidence to help practice?