Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 752 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

You say that the £200 million figure is not a ceiling. How far would the NWF go to make any of the project willow options viable?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

You said that that is a long-term proposition. It is anticipated that no project willow options will be under way before 2030, and that job levels will not reach those that existed at the refinery before 2040, so what happens to the skilled workforce in the short term?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

With regard to the £600 million loan guarantee for the Ineos project in Antwerp, your Labour colleague Brian Leishman said:

“I have been told that the Government have no plans to stop that money, even though INEOS plans to close the Grangemouth refinery, with the loss of thousands of jobs. Why is there £600 million for Antwerp and not Grangemouth, and why would the Government allow that to happen and not use the £600 million as leverage with INEOS, to avoid Scottish job losses?—[Official Report, House of Commons, 21 January 2025; Vol 760, c 858.]

Those words are from your colleague.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

So it is 50:50.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

How did you arrive at the figure of £200 million?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

So the £200 million is effectively match funding. How much of it has been released so far?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

Good morning, minister. I have one question about energy security and I will then ask you about another area. Grangemouth was important for Scotland’s fuel security needs and supplied enough fuel to meet roughly 65 per cent of the fuel requirements for Scotland. As the site moves to being an import terminal, do you see those levels remaining at 65 per cent? Stanlow refinery is expanding, with a £500 million investment to handle increased demand, predominantly from Scotland. How do you see the future?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

However, it is still a threat—if you threaten to remove it. If Ineos did not require the loan guarantee, it would not have asked for it, so you had leverage to get more out of Ineos than you currently have. Why did you not use that leverage? That £600 million loan guarantee was obviously required by Ineos to invest in Antwerp, but you have not done anything to get leverage from that to save jobs at Grangemouth.

09:45  

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Financial Considerations When Leaving an Abusive Relationship

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

On your point about having to manage the process yourself, the DWP has just announced a consultation. If I understand correctly, there is a proposal to take the payments in-house, so that the parent without care would pay the maintenance money directly to the CMS, which would then pay it to the other parent. How effective would that be, given the issues that you raised?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Financial Considerations When Leaving an Abusive Relationship

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Gordon MacDonald

Kirsty McKechnie, I ask you the same question about the effectiveness of the Child Maintenance Service and what needs to change.