The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 752 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You say that the £200 million figure is not a ceiling. How far would the NWF go to make any of the project willow options viable?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You said that that is a long-term proposition. It is anticipated that no project willow options will be under way before 2030, and that job levels will not reach those that existed at the refinery before 2040, so what happens to the skilled workforce in the short term?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
With regard to the £600 million loan guarantee for the Ineos project in Antwerp, your Labour colleague Brian Leishman said:
“I have been told that the Government have no plans to stop that money, even though INEOS plans to close the Grangemouth refinery, with the loss of thousands of jobs. Why is there £600 million for Antwerp and not Grangemouth, and why would the Government allow that to happen and not use the £600 million as leverage with INEOS, to avoid Scottish job losses?—[Official Report, House of Commons, 21 January 2025; Vol 760, c 858.]
Those words are from your colleague.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
So it is 50:50.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
How did you arrive at the figure of £200 million?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
So the £200 million is effectively match funding. How much of it has been released so far?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning, minister. I have one question about energy security and I will then ask you about another area. Grangemouth was important for Scotland’s fuel security needs and supplied enough fuel to meet roughly 65 per cent of the fuel requirements for Scotland. As the site moves to being an import terminal, do you see those levels remaining at 65 per cent? Stanlow refinery is expanding, with a £500 million investment to handle increased demand, predominantly from Scotland. How do you see the future?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
However, it is still a threat—if you threaten to remove it. If Ineos did not require the loan guarantee, it would not have asked for it, so you had leverage to get more out of Ineos than you currently have. Why did you not use that leverage? That £600 million loan guarantee was obviously required by Ineos to invest in Antwerp, but you have not done anything to get leverage from that to save jobs at Grangemouth.
09:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
On your point about having to manage the process yourself, the DWP has just announced a consultation. If I understand correctly, there is a proposal to take the payments in-house, so that the parent without care would pay the maintenance money directly to the CMS, which would then pay it to the other parent. How effective would that be, given the issues that you raised?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Kirsty McKechnie, I ask you the same question about the effectiveness of the Child Maintenance Service and what needs to change.