The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 275 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Neil Bibby
That would be very helpful.
This is my last question on pay and financial planning. I understand that, in June 2024, HES budgeted for a 2 per cent increase in pay despite the Scottish Government having set out a public sector pay policy just two months before that suggested an increase of 3 per cent in the public sector. Is that correct? Is that your understanding? What does it say about your organisation’s financial planning if it is not adhering to the Scottish Government’s pay policy?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 September 2025
Neil Bibby
Clearly, it is a challenging period. You have to put measures in place and make efficiency savings in your organisation. Money is tight, and you have a considerable number of staff—around 1,800. With all of that in mind, why did HES agree a new pay and grading framework in April that will see a new top grade of employee, presumably directors, who will have their earnings potentially increased by between 16 and 18 per cent? If the organisation is looking for efficiency savings, why is the organisation introducing that top band?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Neil Bibby
I completely agree with your opening comment that any attack on a war memorial is cruel, offensive and deeply disrespectful. We do not want such attacks to take place in any part of Scotland.
You have talked a lot about creating a deterrent, but to what extent do we also need education? I would be interested to know the extent to which the attacks on war memorials have been organised and politically motivated, as opposed to people who should know better having done something really stupid. What is the balance between those two groups? Do we need education, as well as a deterrent, to prevent such attacks from happening?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Neil Bibby
I repeat that any attacks on war memorials are deeply disrespectful. They are a scourge and we should do everything that we can to eradicate them.
When it comes to the balance between deterrence and education, your mention of community payback orders was, I thought, really interesting. Some might point out that we have war memorials to remember the sacrifice made by so many generations of our countrymen and women, who did their duty to this country in protecting our freedom. However, your bill on the desecration of war memorials could take away people’s freedoms for up to 10 years. Some might feel uncomfortable about that, when we think of those who fought for our freedom, and perhaps we should be focusing more on community payback orders. At the end of the day, our veterans and the people who have fought for this country have done it a huge service, and such orders would be a more appropriate sentence for the most severe attacks on war memorials than a custodial sentence of up to 10 years.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you for that thorough answer. When do you expect the report to be published?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Neil Bibby
I am just keen to understand the review that is being carried out. My understanding from the Scottish Government website is that the fund is going to be independently reviewed in 2025, but there was a review in 2020. I appreciate what you have said about the matter being kept under constant review, but I wonder why you seem to be having a review now, when you had a review in 2020. How does the review this year differ from the review carried out in 2020?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I support and welcome the aid that the Scottish Government has committed to giving to Gaza. Obviously, I recognise the real challenges that there are in getting it to the people who really need it.
On the wider point about humanitarian emergency funding, I understand that the Scottish Government has been, or is, reviewing its approach to such funding generally. Is that correct?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
What about the informal discussions? Was the UK Government aware of informal discussions that the Scottish Government is having with the EU?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Neil Bibby
I think that it is really important that I finish my point, Mr Robertson, because you have had plenty of opportunities to speak.
Was the UK Government aware of all the discussions that the Scottish Government had with the European Union during the negotiations? Was the UK Government kept in the dark about the Scottish Government’s discussions?