The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 199 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Thanks very much.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Are there any other thoughts from panel members on that question?
The key difference between Taith and Turing is that the former is reciprocal, whereas the latter only allows for outward mobility. Another important difference is that Taith is open to staff as well as learners, but Turing is only open to learners. Is there data yet that details how staff and inward students engage with Taith? If so, when could that become available?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Neil Bibby
Yes.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. Only 36 projects have been funded by the Scottish education exchange programme, compared to 199 for the Taith scheme in Wales. Has the Scottish Government acted quickly enough, given that the Welsh Government has had the Taith scheme operating since 2022?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Are there any other thoughts on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Costs were mentioned. I think that the reluctance at the UK level to adopt or take forward Erasmus+ has been on the basis of costs. It is fair to assume, as has been mentioned, that the reason behind any prevention of Scotland adopting a scheme like Taith, which operates in Wales, has also been about the cost to the Scottish Government. I am not sure whether anyone knows of reasons other than costs for why such a scheme has not been adopted in Scotland. If there are other reasons, I am interested to hear them.
A number of witnesses have touched on the impact on disadvantaged students. Sai Viswanathan mentioned drop-out rates. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? That was the ethos behind it. I am interested to get the witnesses’ thoughts on that.
We have information from the House of Commons library and the Department for Education that shows that, over the past few years, the number of participating students in England has increased and that, in Scotland, it has fallen. The percentage of disadvantaged participants in Scotland has fallen from 51 per cent in 2022-23 to 45 per cent in 2024-25. In England, it has risen from 53 per cent to 55 per cent in the same period. In Wales, it has fallen from 37 per cent to 33 per cent.
Obviously, different things are happening in different countries. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? Do those figures also include drop-out rates?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Neil Bibby
That is helpful. Thanks for your answers.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Neil Bibby
I want to come back to the issue of production. Mr Davie said that the Ofcom test is not good enough for the BBC.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. I agree with my colleagues George Adam and Stephen Kerr on coverage of the Scottish Parliament. I raised that issue last year.
I hear, too, what has been said about the BBC Scotland channel having no content. I appreciate that you have to take decisions when there is potentially better content. I will leave others to decide whether that is the case. However, given that there is nothing on the BBC Scotland channel during the day, it seems to me that that should be looked at, even in light of the constraints. I heard the answers that were given earlier; I just wanted to put that on the record.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Neil Bibby
You have talked about doing the right thing, investing in Scotland and doing more. Concerns have been raised regarding “The Traitors”. Research by the Scottish film maker Peter Strachan involved analysis of the crew and showed that, for the latest series, 5.9 per cent of the crew were Scottish. I think that we would want to do better than that, if we are talking about doing the right thing and investing in creative industries and Scottish production.
I understand that three new series of “The Traitors” are set to be filmed over the next few months—a UK version, a US version and a celebrity version. In terms of achieving better outcomes, doing more and seeing greater investment and more people in Scotland employed in production that the BBC is supporting and that qualifies as Scotland based, how many more people from Scotland can we expect to see working on those three series in the coming months?