The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 302 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you. That is a fair point. I do not know whether Rachel Minto wants to say anything about resources.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Neil Bibby
No—that is fine. Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. We are all keen to see effective intergovernmental activity and effective scrutiny of that activity. We have discussed a range of different things that could be done to improve that, most of which will involve some cost in terms of time, expertise or resources. What additional resources—cost as well as time—would any changes that can be made involve for the Government and the Parliament? To what extent is it worth spending that resource? I am sure that lots of measures could be taken. Could resources be found within existing budgets, or does extra money need to be spent on it?
I will start with Mireia Grau Creus. Given the formalised structure in Spain, can we also assume that more resources are spent on IGR there?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Neil Bibby
On that very point, a clear outcome of any referendum that establishes the settled will of the people of Scotland is what is desired, regardless of whether there is a requirement for a supermajority.
This also takes us back to the point that Professor Tomkins made earlier. In the 2014 referendum, it was not just the Scottish Government that was arguing at the time that there was a democratic mandate for a referendum through the Scottish Parliament elections; there was a sense that not just the Scottish Government and the UK Government, but both sides of the debate in Scotland—yes and no—had decided that it was time for those questions to be put. If you want that sort of clear and concise outcome in any future referendum, there will have to be consent, not just at a UK Government versus Scottish Government level, but within Scotland and on both sides of the debate—or as close to both sides as possible, because you are never going to get unanimity on this matter—that such a referendum should take place.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Neil Bibby
You mentioned HES bringing in an independent HR team. We have talked about the need for a cultural review of the organisation and have heard about individual processes that need to be followed before that takes place. For clarity, would a cultural review of the organisation be an independent review?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Neil Bibby
You mention learning lessons about how this has come to pass. Do you think that it is just a HES problem? Are there similar issues in other parts of the culture sector or the public sector? Maybe not to the same extent, but—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Neil Bibby
I was asking because we have had a lot of discussion today about problems at the top, but the staff on the ground and throughout the organisation are obviously working hard in difficult circumstances. A meeting may be something to consider.
We have talked a lot about the culture in the organisation. I want to ask about financial planning and financial management. You said that the organisation is “commercially successful”. I have raised concerns previously with HES about financial planning in relation to financial strategies and pay awards, and whether the organisation was budgeting sufficiently for pay awards that were in line with public sector pay policy. Concerns have also been raised previously about changes to pay grades. To what extent are you reassured about HES when it comes to financial planning and financial management? It has, I think, a £73 million budget from Scottish Government.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning. Just on that last point, it has been reported that a group of staff is now considering legal action against HES and the Scottish Government for failures under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and the Equality Act 2010. How concerned are you that the Scottish Government could be facing legal action?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 November 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you. I have two final questions. There have been a lot of discussions about what meetings you have held, cabinet secretary, and with whom. Have you met, or are you planning to meet, the HES trade union representatives?