The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 334 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
We mentioned the tensions regarding what the BBC needs to deal with. Earlier, I raised the issue of axing radio shows such as Billy Sloan’s and Iain Anderson’s. We have seen a decline in support for the licence fee and for paying the licence fee. Is there a danger that the BBC is chasing a younger generation or a younger audience to the detriment of its loyal listener/viewer licence fee base? Do you think the BBC is going to get that balance right?
I heard Professor Higgins loud and clear when he talked about the importance of audience diversity and programming. When the BBC says that it is changing these programmes because it is going after a younger audience and modernising, does it know best in terms of the changes that it is making? It would be interesting to get the witnesses’ thoughts on whether the BBC is making the right choices.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
I will leave it there.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
When we talk about modernising broadcasting, we talk about changing what people do and moving with the times in relation to content and about the ways in which people consume content in terms of technology. Modernisation is definitely happening, and people need to move with the times. Nobody objects to that. The concern about modernisation is about the impact of AI and technological changes on jobs. Both John McLellan and Nick McGowan-Lowe raised issues about the impact of AI—Nick in particular laid out a range of concerns in that area.
Catherine, you said that we have to look at what is coming down the track. There are obviously huge advances in technology and AI. Is the solution to the issues that have been raised better regulation of the use of AI in broadcasting and the media landscape?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
There are obviously wider questions and a bigger debate about AI. However, media broadcasting and journalism are a vital link to our democracy and to the need to tackle misinformation, and so it is important that we look at the issue carefully.
I do not know whether John or Nick want to comment on that.
11:00Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
We talked a lot in the first evidence session about modernising and advances in technology, and we are also doing so in this session.
Catherine, you talked in your submission about the efficacy of the operation at ITV Border. How do you ensure that further advances in technology taken forward by ITV Border do not result in fewer staff and fewer jobs in your organisation?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
I am glad that Professor Higgins raised that example, because I was going to raise the issue of the axing of the Billy Sloan show and the Iain Anderson show. I am sure that I am not the only MSP who has been contacted by a great number of constituents who are concerned about the impact that that will have, not just on listeners but on the opportunity to profile new and emerging artists in Scotland and give them exposure for the first time. That is a retrograde step.
We have just discussed the need for autonomy in BBC Scotland, but those decisions appear to have been made by BBC Scotland about the future of BBC Radio Scotland. Yes, there might be questions about autonomy, resources and so on, but is BBC Radio Scotland making the right decisions in that respect? Your answer just now suggests that you would agree that it is not. Clearly, there are issues about autonomy and decisions that are made on programming in Scotland.
09:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
For the Scottish Government to say that it was not informed of the UK-US trade deal when there is evidence to suggest that extensive discussions were on-going about it shows that we need to be a bit more caveated about our statements in relation to intergovernmental relations.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
That information would be helpful, because we are currently talking about perceptions. It would be good to get full information on which ministers, across different departments, are meeting and when.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
That would be good.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Neil Bibby
There has been a lot of talk about perceptions and vibes. I asked the cabinet secretary earlier about the number of meetings because we wanted to establish some facts and because I thought that it would be helpful to have that information. However, in his written submission to the committee, the cabinet secretary said:
“The Scottish Government was not informed of the proposed UK-US trade deal ahead of the announcement.”
I know that he said earlier that he does not have responsibility for intergovernmental relations, but is the cabinet secretary’s position and understanding that the Scottish Government was not informed of the proposed deal?