The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1122 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
Did you watch the evidence session with Shane O’Neill, Blair Grubb and the interim chair? I inferred earlier that you had not watched it, but you had.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
No, I am referring to the evidence session with Shane O’Neill, Blair Grubb and Tricia Bey. Did you watch that one?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
It did not require the benefit of hindsight, though. There were fires going on and there were warnings across the system of higher education, not only in Scotland but across the UK. There were alarm bells. Surely the two pictures did not match up. All of that was going on outside of your university, so did you think that you were unique and that there was no impact greater than what you had already identified? Surely you were asking questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
Just pay the £150,000 back. That would be a start, would it not? To hold on to that just seems astonishing, given the pain that other people are feeling. I know that it is not on the scale of the £35 million deficit, but it would at least be an indication that you understand.
I will not press that any more, but I genuinely want you to think about that, because I think that, although it would not repair the damage, it would send an important message.
A year ago, in this very building, you gave evidence to this committee. At the time, you told me:
“I am delighted to say that our universities in Scotland are actually quite well run”,
and you went on to say:
“I do not at the moment see any risk to survival.”
Then you said:
“We are well-run institutions. Time will be my witness in this, but I personally see no risk to the viability of universities going forward.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee,12 June 2024; c 5-6.]
At the same time, you knew that the cash reserves at the university were in steep decline; that the university had a potential breach of the banking covenant—although you said this morning that you were not aware of that; that the Times Higher Education world university rankings had Dundee dropping out of the top 250; and that there was an £8 million hole in that year’s budget, with no plans in place to deliver the savings that were necessary to move into a surplus position. So, a year ago, were you delusional or incompetent, or was there something else? I cannot understand why you would have said what you said to me, knowing all those things.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
I have two questions. First, that individual said that there were others at Leicester university who knew about your behaviour, and it was widespread; it was widely known. Secondly, in your first answer to me, you said, “Certainly not.” I cannot remember what period you were referring to, but I am sure that you implied that you were talking about your time at Dundee university. Before you were at Leicester university, were there any other times when there were complaints that you were aware of, or people objecting to your behaviour? Was there any of that at any time?
Come on—you would remember such things, surely. They are a direct criticism of your behaviour. I would certainly know if people were complaining about my behaviour. Is there nothing else?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
—and “final salary pension.” There is no point in going over it again, but for you to have denied it initially, when this person felt so strongly about it and when it affected their life so deeply, and for you not to recall it—I am afraid that that tells us a lot about you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
While the committee has been meeting this morning, the individual who complained about you at the NERC has communicated back to me. The individual says:
“THANK YOU. I did not move to another research council. I left completely and went to a university, completely broken. I lost a lot, including my final salary pension.”
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
What about when you were at the University of Leicester?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
To be honest, yesterday was quite sad, because the people who were before the committee clearly struggled with their jobs. It was notable the number of times that they said, “I wasn’t aware of that information at the time.” No one had an inquiring mind, and Peter Fotheringham in particular clearly struggled in his role, which he admitted yesterday. If you had watched the evidence, you would have seen that. Similarly, the chair did not have a financial background and she was not inquiring.
Were you not aware of the fact that your team was not up to the job? It was your job to ensure that you had a proper team around you. Were you not aware of any of that? You are passing the buck to everybody else. You say that you were not told and you were not aware, and that the fact that you did not have a grip was because other people had not told you what was happening. However, it was your job to know those things.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Willie Rennie
Or whether you were delusional. That is what I asked. Or was it something else? I just do not understand it.