The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1234 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
For clarity, do you agree with Sheriff Mackie?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
My second question was going to be about grounds for referral, but you have given more detail on that. Do you wish to add anything on the grounds issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
Do you think that the Government is getting in the way, then?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
My final question, which is a more general one, follows on from the convener’s questions at the beginning of the session. Do you feel good about the progress that has been made on the Promise?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
So do you think that the Government should just be frank and admit that the Promise, in the terms in which it was originally set, will not be met by 2030? Do you think that we should just be frank with people, rather than continuing to kid ourselves that we will manage to achieve that target? Report after report tells us that we will not achieve it. We keep on hearing about the need for caution and realism and so on. Should we not just be honest with people and admit that the Promise that was made in 2020 will not be met by 2030, as was promised?
09:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
Mr Trainer, your organisation has been quite critical of the current
“confrontational and not child centred”
approach of the children’s hearings system. Sheriff Mackie has said something similar and has indicated that he would like to see a change of culture. Do you think that that is enough? If not, what more needs to be done?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
Does anybody else want to come in on this issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
But trust is really important. The young people we are talking about do not trust very many people. Even if we came up with all the money that was necessary, the process would still have to be managed in a realistic way with the people you have. Therefore, even if the money was all there, would you manage to meet the Promise by 2030?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Willie Rennie
You have all expressed caution. I have heard you talk about realism, managing expectations and being overly optimistic. We are already behind the curve on meeting the Promise by 2030—I do not think that anyone here today has said we are actually going to meet it by then, and you have said that a single bill will not move us forward towards meeting it. Are you saying that we are even further behind than we thought we were?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Willie Rennie
Your report last week was probably the clearest that you have been, but I think that you are still behind the curve, because other organisations have been warning about this in stark terms for some time now.
You are clearly not gonnae tell us today how many job losses and cuts in student numbers are needed, and how much more money will be required to avoid those job losses. I think that you will regret that, because you have statutory responsibilities—as you have set out—and because you have pulled your punches in previous years, and we have ended up in some difficulties as a result of that reluctance to be straight with Government and with the public about what is required.
If you are not going to tell us how many job losses there will be, by how much student numbers will be cut, and how much more money is required, will you at least tell us how urgent the situation is? When do you expect colleges and universities to start announcing plans for big changes? Are we talking weeks or months?