The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 928 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Willie Rennie
The figures are from the Scottish Parliament information centre. If you dig into your briefing, I am sure that you will discover that there is a £268 million cut. Councillors across the board, including Scottish National Party councillors, are spitting mad about the local authority settlement, so I cannot understand why you are not, given that education is a massive part of what local authorities do. Why are you not angry?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Willie Rennie
There has been a £100 million cut. Do you have no issues with that at all?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Willie Rennie
With respect, your answer was rubbish, because the Scottish Parliament information centre has made it clear that there is a £268 million cut to local authority budgets, and half of local authorities’ spending is on education. You have made various promises to fund extra teachers and other things, and you should, of course, fund those, because those were your election promises, but that does not entitle you to cut £100 million from core school budgets.
This is not about England; it is about Scotland. I do not want to hear comparisons with elsewhere, because I care about pupils in Scotland. Cabinet secretary, why on earth are you not angry about the cut? I am angry. I cannot believe that the Government is cutting budgets at this time, so why are you not angry about it? That is what I do not understand. What you have said is very managerial.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Willie Rennie
The cabinet secretary has followed the script this morning. Teachers, councillors, pupils and parents will listen to the cabinet secretary’s answers and will draw one conclusion, which is that she is not standing up for Scottish education and making the case for it. There would not be a £100 million cut to core school budgets if she was making the case.
I have finished my questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Willie Rennie
I know that some companies that pay the levy now do less training than they did before. That cannot be right.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Willie Rennie
They are just doing less training. They are not companies that would naturally take on apprentices and now, with the way that the funds are set up, they are doing less training than they were before. How could that ever be credible?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2021
Willie Rennie
Is the situation with the apprenticeship levy not quite a guddle? We have a mixture of policies from the UK Government, which sets the levy, and the Scottish Government, which sets how the funds that come through the funding system are applied. Not every company that pays the levy requires an apprentice. The flexible workforce development fund is not really that flexible and it certainly is not big enough. It was designed to compensate levy payers in the apprenticeship scheme, because not every company needs an apprentice. The flexible workforce development fund has now been diluted by the inclusion of non-levy payers in the system. Is it a surprise that many companies are now doing less training than they were before the apprenticeship levy was brought in? Do you have any reflections on what I have said?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Willie Rennie
Go on.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Willie Rennie
My question is about the Morgan review, additional support for learning and needs. On a scale of one to 10, how close are we to meeting the vision of the Morgan review?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Willie Rennie
That is fine. A couple of weeks ago, we heard from the Educational Institute of Scotland, which is concerned about the consequences of the inadequacies in the system and the effects on teachers of what they have to cope with in the classroom. As we move towards mainstreaming, are we providing enough support so that teachers can cope? We know that demand has increased during the pandemic and that it has exacerbated existing issues and challenges. Are we giving enough support to the teachers on the front line who are having to cope with this?