The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1234 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Willie Rennie
So, as the representatives from the SFC did earlier, you are steering away from new income. Are we just kicking the can down the road? Is that what is happening here? We are talking about 18 months or two years, and the clock is ticking. If we have no vision of any clear, tangible sources of income with margin, are we just kicking the can down the road? Will there be more job losses—which, conveniently, will come after the election?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Willie Rennie
No, I get all that—it is a great place and we have got to keep it—but my question is about providing certainty for those members of staff who have a cloud hanging over their heads. I have had members of staff in tears on the doorstep, because of the indecision since last November. The university is now on its third principal; we still lack a finalised recovery plan and a vision; and the staff are in distress. Good people will go unless we get certainty. My real concern is that the Government is just kicking the can down the road.
Therefore, my follow-up question is this: if we are back here in 18 months to two years, without a new source of income, and we have not closed the gap between income and expenditure, will the Government step in again? How long is this blank cheque going to be written for?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay. Dr Stephen?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
You have read what the Educational Institute of Scotland has said. It is worried that, if you put this on a statutory footing, staff and teachers will just withdraw because they are fearful of stepping over a line that will move.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
Those are all very powerful and effective arguments. However, we have seen that when something moves from being guidance to being statutory, there can be mission creep. Staff can overcompensate because the guidance has a legal footing. In other words, when that happens, things grow arms and legs. Do you not see a circumstance in which—even though there is all the best training and all the right guidance—a staff member might hesitate? What is right for one child is different from what is right for another. The line between what is acceptable and what is not is not clear: it is an invisible line that moves constantly. Do you not see that staff members, with all the other things that are going on in the classroom, might just hesitate for a split second because of that mission creep?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
I have supported Daniel Johnson’s bill—I have signed up to it and I have done a bit of work on the issues, in particular with Beth Morrison—but I will ask some probing questions, because it is our job to ensure that we get this right.
I have not heard this morning about what is, in the most extreme of circumstances, considered to be acceptable restraint. Let us say that a young person is uncontrolled and they are a danger to themselves. How far can you go?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
How long?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
It is about what happens in the moment when the child has lost control, is it not? You might think, “Have they really lost control? Should I step in now or should I wait a little longer?” That might be the crucial moment. You are right—if it is obvious that a child is going to run on to the road, any teacher would do what they could to save them, because that situation would be clear cut. It is the moment of hesitancy that people are worried about. They are saying that, if anything puts up a barrier to them safeguarding the child for fear of being prosecuted for using what would be an illegal restraint, that would be a step too far for them. Can you understand that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
I apologise for pressing you. Suzi, do you want to comment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Willie Rennie
So, you would hold the child. How tight, for how long? When, and in what position? What can you do to save that child’s life?