The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 981 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Those people have practical, tangible experience of your organisation, and they are telling me the opposite of what you have said.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay.
Mr Greer made a point earlier about the Audit Scotland report—which, again, was very scathing. Do you think that that is not relevant any more?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Mr Yeates, the Withers report was pretty scathing about the SDS. I will give you a few snatches of the commentary. It refers to “competing narratives”, “duplication”, “lack of clarity”,
“lack of leadership and effective governance”,
and “harmful, false division”. A particularly critical bit is the comment that the SDS
“doesn’t always appear that it makes decisions or demonstrates behaviours which are focused first on public service delivery or the needs of learners. This dynamic is acting as a blocker for partnership working, joined-up thinking and delivery across the public sector.”
What is your response?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Did the minister ask the review group to consider the amendments? Did he not think that that would be an appropriate thing to do?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Has the minister not asked that question already?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Willie Rennie
What did it say?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Willie Rennie
I understand all the arguments that the cabinet secretary is making, but the education inspectorate is in a different position from the inspectorates of the police and the prisons, because we have had what some would call a crisis in recent years. Although we are separating the SQA from Education Scotland, we need to go further. Does the minister think that there is any avenue that she has examined that we could pursue to give greater independence? If she does not agree with any of the amendments, is there anything that she might consider in order to bolster that? I think that she agrees with me—because she was nodding away when I was contributing earlier—that we need to build up the confidence of the central bodies. Is there nothing that she has looked at that we could pursue to give greater independence in order to build that confidence?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Willie Rennie
Just to seek clarity, is it the Government’s position that we should name qualifications based on the SCQF?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Willie Rennie
That is a very fair point that I should have recognised before. I will take that into consideration.
On the scrutiny of the intervals for inspection, amendment 156 sets out that the minister must also seek the relevant committee’s view before issuing any directions.
My amendments are relatively minor, certainly in comparison with Sue Webber’s amendments. I still think that ministers should have a role, but I think that we should pull back and give the chief inspector greater independence in order to give greater confidence to the central bodies in education. Other members have lodged other amendments that serve the same purpose, which is to nudge the role towards greater independence, but without it giving it the lone wolf status that George Adam so clearly craves.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Willie Rennie
Some people would say—and I would agree—that the inspectorate did not identify the international challenge that Scotland was facing with its performance in education. It did not report on that.
20:30