The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1043 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Why did Withers and Audit Scotland criticise it so much?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay. Thanks.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
The reports that I highlighted are from authoritative individuals and organisations. Where is that criticism coming from? Who is it that they are criticising?
10:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
I turn to John Lewis. As we have discussed, there is a lot going on in the higher and further education world, and the SFC has to deal with many huge challenges. There has been some criticism—as we have also discussed—about the SFC’s inability to spot those challenges in advance and try to address them adequately. Do you think that the SFC is up to the proposed changes at this time?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
I appreciate that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Thank you—that is helpful. Does anybody else want to chip in?
I will bring in Sarah Collins first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Thank you for relaying that example; I have come across others. Too often, local authorities rely on the claim that tenants are not circulating sufficient air within the property. Do we need to provide more evidence about the exact source of mould? The dismissal is leaving tenants in properties that are just uninhabitable.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Willie Rennie
We do not have a committee convener. We decided not to sit on as many committees. We took a different approach from the Greens and decided to focus on areas that we regard as a priority. That means that we are missing out on certain opportunities.
We have got a deputy convener, who happened to be a member of that committee. However, that is probably not as much of a priority as choosing the convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Willie Rennie
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Willie Rennie
I think that Ross Greer and I are the only two original members of this session’s education committee left. The membership has rotated a lot—far too much. I know that that is up to the parties, but I think that it means that the committee loses knowledge, and the team that is created also goes. I therefore appeal to the whips not to rotate members so frequently.
I am not casting any aspersions on the current Scottish National Party members of the committee, but when we scrutinised the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill, the three SNP members were prepared to step out, not vote with the whip and test the Government minister in a way that I thought showed a committee working at its best. They were not being rebellious; they were just doing the right thing, and that does not always happen. We sometimes see members with the whip in front of them, and they vote in exactly the same way every single time and do not question anything. I have seen both extremes.
My point is that a lot of this is down to individuals. The structure has an impact and it incentivises different behaviours, but, unless you have a culture that is collaborative and unless members of the governing party are prepared to test and challenge, you will get a bit of a stultifying experience whereby nothing really moves forward. When the members challenge, ministers are forced to engage more effectively, and I think that they do a better job as a result. I think that we ended up with a better Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Bill as a result of those members behaving differently.
We need some structural reform, but my appeal is for members of the governing party to see the benefit of straying just a little bit from the whip into challenge, rather than just adhering to what they are told to do. That is my advice.