The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1339 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
You would be scathing of any other Government that made such a change halfway through the process. You would say that it had broken its promise, let teachers down and left lots of them unemployed, but you say that this change is somebody else’s fault. Surely you should accept responsibility for changing the policy halfway through and leaving lots of people unemployed. Do you not accept any responsibility for that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Why did the First Minister say what he said yesterday, which was different from what you have said today? Is it just that you have reflected on all of this overnight? When did you make the decision to say what you have said today?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
They are contradictory to what was said yesterday.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
This follows on from what Paul O’Kane asked about. When Michael Marra was a member of the committee, he challenged Shirley-Anne Somerville, your predecessor, about whether the Covid recovery plan—the education recovery plan—was sufficient for the task. She was adamant that it was. She said:
“Working together, we will ensure that all pupils are given the support that they need to recover their learning and health and wellbeing. That includes maximising how we support and challenge improvement and reduce the variability in what children achieve in different parts of the country.”—[Official Report, 3 June 2021; c 29.]
She was therefore adamant that the plan was good enough and that it would deal with the undoubted challenges of the pandemic.
However, we now know that we will not close the poverty-related attainment gap, as was promised. I know that the minister will talk about the pandemic. Why was the plan not sufficient to meet the challenge, and why was Michael Marra not listened to?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I know, but I was here.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
There are 170,000 pupils at school now who are in the bottom 20 per cent of the Scottish index of multiple deprivation and their fortunes have hardly budged an inch in the past 10 years. The minister should not hide behind pupils and their success, which is undoubted—they have had successes. What about those 170,000 people who were promised that the gap would close, but it has not been closed, and who were told that the recovery plan was good enough and that they would be assisted and they have not been? What do we have to say to those people? Do they not matter?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Finally, some groups are concerned that, if there is mandatory reporting, young people might be less likely to open up and share their experiences. Is that one of your concerns about mandatory reporting?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
You have said all that before, but it has not broken the logjam. What will you offer that is new in order to make such a change? As you say, we cannot have a strike, so what will you do? The teachers panel is pretty clear about where the responsibility lies.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
The panel is pretty clear about where the responsibility lies: it is your manifesto commitment, which you have not delivered.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Yesterday, the SNCT teachers panel met, and it was pretty scathing about the Scottish Government’s proposals, saying that they
“fail to adequately address the pressing need to resolve the SNCT dispute on reducing weekly class contact time to 21 hours”.
Its response also talked about a “lack of meaningful progress” and referred to its “statutory ballot”.
Why has the education secretary’s announcement on the four-day teaching week not broken the logjam, and what new things will she do to prevent the strike at the end of January?