The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1290 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
I am anxious about that. First of all, on the message that you are sending, if you are saying that this is for those who are most in need and that there is going to be an assessment, it sounds like a filter, rather than just saying that there is a right to receive support. I am anxious about the distinction between the right to request an assessment and the right to receive support. It sounds like a budget-saving measure to limit the amount of support that is provided. Why not just bluntly say, “Everybody will have the right to receive support—full stop”?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Was there consultation with North Yorkshire Council?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Whether the bill has been costed appropriately, whether there is a cliff edge—the fact that we will stop aftercare at a certain age—and whether eligibility is reaching far enough into different types of care-experienced people. I would quite like to address those issues.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
I will ask about aftercare. There is some concern about eligibility, funding and the cliff edge. Could you talk about some of the issues that have been raised and how you would address those concerns about aftercare?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
But does the bill specify that that support has to be provided? Local authorities can do a lot of things—they have the right to do all sorts of things—but are they compelled to provide that support?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
North Yorkshire Council is hailed as an exemplar in the United Kingdom for its right to return and its always here policy, which, simply put, involves aftercare and support. There is no cliff edge: people can get that support throughout their life. They can get support with housing, employment and the whole range of services. Also, in specific circumstances, there is a right to return to care.
Duncan Dunlop, who gave evidence to the committee, specifically stated that North Yorkshire was an example that we should be following, so I am surprised that that was not at least picked up from him, or picked up before that. With a simple search we can find that North Yorkshire has been hailed as a great exemplar. Why are we not drawing on experiences from south of the border?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
On housing, our witnesses expressed concern that the problems that many care-experienced people have around homelessness will not be addressed by the bill’s provisions. Can you reassure me that they will be addressed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
When people say “benefit most”, it always sounds like a way of limiting the available support. North Yorkshire Council says bluntly, “We’re always here.” It might be that the young person does not need a huge amount of support—they might just need a listening ear—but the message is straightforward. It is not bureaucratic language around the right to request an assessment, which might possibly lead to a level of support. It does not say, “We have limited resources, so it might not be available to everybody.” Why not just say, “We are always here” and make it plain for people who already distrust bureaucracy? Why tie it up? I understand that people might say that you need to have an assessment to ensure that the support goes to the right people, but why not just keep it really clear that you will always be there for them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
They have expressed concern to us. Maybe we are hearing from different people, but people have expressed concern.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Thank you for telling me that North Yorkshire is not a country. [Laughter.]