The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1290 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Rennie
If you are specifying that training is required, that should improve clarity and ensure that individuals have greater understanding of the requirements. However, you are not providing any greater clarity about what is permitted in practice and what is not, because the guidance is already established. All that you are talking about is placing the guidance on a statutory footing, so the bill will not provide any more clarity. Is that not the case?
10:00Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Rennie
My second point is about the General Teaching Council for Scotland, which, as you will have heard, is almost saying that the bill is piecemeal and that we need to take a broader look at safeguarding and child protection, because most of that is dealt with through guidance and is not on a statutory footing. What is your answer to that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Rennie
I make it clear that, as Mr Johnson knows, I am a supporter of the bill. I just think that it is important to ask difficult questions.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Thanks very much.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Willie Rennie
That comes to the nub of it. We already have guidance, so there should be all the clarity that we are looking for. We are talking about putting the guidance on a statutory footing. We have seen that doing that sometimes leads to mission creep and overcaution, with people going further than is required in order to ensure that they are covered and are not flouting the legislation. Is there not a danger that, because of that fear, we will make people much more cautious at critical moments when intervention is required, which could cause mission creep?
The concern is not about recording incidents or what the guidance says about what is appropriate for restraint but about the extra caution that could come from legislating that might endanger children.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
The bill’s provisions do not extend the right to receive support to those leaving care prior to the age of 16. Why is that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
So, that is wrong; such support is available to all those leaving care prior to the age of 16.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Some of our witnesses expressed concern that there was no clarity about the definitions—that eligibility was not clear. For instance, is the provision available for informal kinship arrangements? There is a lack of clarity on such things. The provisions are very vague, which is why witnesses have raised concerns.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Just to return, a distinction seems to have been drawn between the right to request an assessment and the right to receive support. Why does the bill make that distinction between the two? Why not just say that there is a right to receive support, rather than a right to request an assessment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Rennie
Why do you not progress that approach?