The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1339 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I do not really get this. I have struggled to understand the motivation behind why you have done this. If you had said earlier what you have said today, the episode might have come to an end. Instead, there has been a constant reinterpretation of events, with different ministers saying different things. Even yesterday, the First Minister said something different from what you have said today. I do not understand why you were not clear from the very beginning. Why was that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I think that it is clear from your reaction to the point that the convener made about your call with Alexis Jay that you know that it was a mistake and that you should have had an official on the call. It seems that a series of mistakes have occurred throughout this episode, and that is why people’s confidence in you has been shaken through this process. Do you understand that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Professor Jay, I am interested in who your main ministerial contact is and whether that has changed over time, with your engagement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
It was your responsibility. You recruited and trained thousands of extra teachers based on the promise that we would reduce teacher contact time, and they are now unemployed. You cannot suddenly say, after you have failed to deliver on the manifesto, that it is all the councils’ fault. It was your manifesto commitment, and those people are pretty angry now.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I am going to conclude. Those people have heard all this before and nothing has changed. They do not have confidence in the Government to deliver. The reality is that the Government has not delivered the promise to close the gap that it made 10 years ago, and that is the reality for 170,000 people.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
If you do not have a job, that makes no difference, and lots of them do not have a job.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
It sounded like blame to me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Has Angela Constance been a regular correspondent with you?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
And the First Minister?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Let us hope that that works. Initially, the approach was to recruit 3,500 extra teachers to create the space to reduce teacher contact time. Now you have worked out, through your various bits of research, that the falling school population would allow you to do so without recruiting 3,500 extra teachers, which leaves lots of them underemployed or unemployed. Do you regret changing the approach halfway through the process?