The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7218 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
It would be helpful to write a letter to the Government on the issues that Mark Ruskell has raised. Technically, I should seek the committee’s permission to sign off that letter on its behalf as a result of our discussion. Are members happy with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Water is so fundamental to everything that we do that putting a value on it is difficult. Even back in the 1980s, when I was a young soldier, I was told that most future wars would be fought over water, and that, if we did not get our approach to water management right, it would be a serious problem, especially with such high and low levels happening in the same year.
I will hand over to Mark Ruskell, who will ask our next questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
That is a bit of a politician’s answer. Will the carbon budgets that we were given as a Parliament make the 2045 target achievable or do they mean that we are skating on thin ice?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
It appears to me that the simple answer is that we write—well, I will ask the question, to be totally correct.
Is the committee content that the provision that is set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I have a final easy question to end the session with. Scotland has kept its ambition for net zero for 2045, but it has lowered its ambition for interim emission reductions. Are you happy with that and are we doing enough?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
That is everyone’s aim, but those costs remain stubbornly high for most people.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
It appears to me that you are saying that a 4°C rise by the end of the century is possible but that a 3°C rise is more likely. Is that what you are saying?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
As far as reducing global emissions is concerned, there are much bigger players in the world than the United Kingdom. We have seen a bit of a step change in what China is trying to achieve. What changes, such as those in China, have we seen in the past year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
You have said that ambition is one thing and that the reducing costs of some of the technology mean that it is more likely that we will meet our ambition, but the costs at ground level in people’s houses remain stubbornly high, so it is difficult for people to meet those costs. Will that be a challenge? At the latest COP, it was said that, if we do not take everyone with us, we will never succeed. Do you want to elaborate on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Edward Mountain
The fourth agenda item is consideration of two consent notifications relating to proposed UK statutory instruments. The first is on biocidal products. Under the GB Biocidal Products Regulation, companies must obtain authorisation from the Health and Safety Executive to market biocidal products. Biocidal products are substances or mixtures that are designed to control harmful organisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, insects or rodents.
The amendment regulations relate not to the substance of that regulation but to a data protection aspect in it, as outlined in the clerk’s paper. The committee’s role is to decide whether it agrees with the Scottish Government about the proposed change. We can express a view both on whether we agree in principle to the UK Government legislating in the area and on whether we agree with the specific manner in which it proposes to do so.
If we are content for consent to be given, I will write to the Scottish Government accordingly. In writing to the Scottish Government, we of course have the option to draw matters to the Government’s attention, pose questions or ask to be kept updated on particular matters. If the committee is not content with the proposal, it might make one or several recommendations, as outlined in the clerk’s note.
I do not see anyone who wants to express a view, so I will move to the substantive question. Is the committee content that the provision that is set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument?
Members indicated agreement.