The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6265 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
IPSA is confident, and you are confident.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. Thank you very much, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Having raised that point, I think that it is important to pursue it. A bit of research that I have done suggests that sums of up to £20,000 in relation to admin appointments could be paid on top of a councillor’s salary. It is difficult, because there are exceptions, and I know that the minister has alluded to that. Additional pay and grading might be disallowed in some council areas but encouraged in other areas. I encourage monitoring of that to make sure, and I ask for a clear comment that it would not be expected that people who are getting that additional money would take it on top of their salary. I would be grateful if the minister could say that that is his understanding—unless perhaps it is not.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I believe that, in some councils, people in senior administration roles or roles with additional responsibilities receive allowances on top of their council salary. Therefore, why have you deducted only the basic rate, given that they could be getting the basic rate-plus?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
From that point of view, it is the easier route. I can understand that, because it is easy to administer. However, minister, is it possible to put on the record the fact that, if somebody was getting additional pay on top of their councillor pay, you would not expect them to draw it, because it would make them better off than an MSP or just a normal councillor who had become a member of the Parliament?
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I have probably explored that matter as far as I can. However, I would just comment that the way that the salaries have been dealt with—deducted at source—is a much more comfortable position than allowing people to choose charities. Sometimes, that can be difficult to administer, and the individual might have links with those charities, which could create problems. Therefore, deducting the salary at source is the right way to do it and a huge step in the right direction.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Graham Hutchings, I know that you want to come in, but I will let Kevin Stewart ask his question first, as you might be able to answer the two together.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Graham, do not lean back. Does anyone want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Edward Mountain
Sebastian, you are on.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Edward Mountain
I hear what you are saying, and I guess that it brings us back to Graham Hutchings’s comment that SAF might not be suitable for smaller airlines that provide, say, island-hopping trips. My point, though, is that if they wanted to use it, they might not be able to get their hands on it, because British Airways might be buying it all, simply because it can and because the fuel might not be being produced locally. I think that we ought to consider that issue, too.
Thank you all very much. I have to say that I am disappointed to find that all those days that I spent as a child, looking at the patterns of the contrails across the sky, were actually spent looking at pollution.
It has been a very interesting session. I am also slightly concerned that we could distort things to the extent that it would be cheaper to fly to Australia on a long-haul flight than it would be to fly to Spain on a short-haul flight. That might affect a lot of people’s holidays.
Before we move into private session, I just want to put on record that, in line with standing orders, Monica Lennon, who is not here this morning, would not have been able to be present for the discussion on item 6, and that Sarah Boyack was to join us instead. That is because the discussion is going to be on Monica Lennon’s bill.
I thank our witnesses very much, and I am sorry for the slight problems that we had with broadcasting. We will now move into private session.
11:14 Meeting continued in private until 12:42.