The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6265 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Before we leave this subject, I have to say that I seem to have been looking at trains for as long as I have been looking at ferries, both in this and in the previous parliamentary session. I seem to remember four ministers coming in and justifying why Abellio should lose the contract on the basis that it did not meet its PPM targets—that was the reason given to the committee. Bill Reeve has given the main reasons for not meeting the target—there were six of them, I think—and the problems that ScotRail is facing are the same ones that Abellio faced. We now have fewer trains running and a lower performance than Abellio was achieving. Why is that good news for Scotland and Scotland’s commuters, cabinet secretary?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I am not sure that that response has taken me any further. My premise is that, with fewer trains running, we should have greater accuracy on delivering trains within five minutes of their scheduled arrival time. However, we do not seem to have that, and you have said that we will not be in the position in which Abellio was with the PPM until 2027, which seems poor.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Thanks, Monica. Bob, did you want to ask some questions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I do not think that it would prejudice the discussions over the purchase of the port if you were to clarify whether, prior to your time as cabinet secretary, any discussions took place about whether the base should be Troon or Ardrossan.
We also heard that Peel Ports had offered to invest in Ardrossan to the tune of £170 million-ish for the improvements to the quayside to allow a 102m ferry into the harbour, because the berth was only 97m. Is that true?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I would be interested to hear Chris’s point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Okay. The other thing that we heard when we met Peel Ports was that the heads of terms had been agreed for the purchase of Ardrossan and that it was just a question of transferring the money, at which point it would become the Scottish Government’s port. Is that the case, or not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I am not disputing that. What I am trying to work out is this. We were very much told that the heads of terms had been agreed. Having done purchases of land in my previous profession, I know that it can be done quite quickly. I am not asking what the price is, but if this were to be agreed today, would you have the money to buy it tomorrow? Could it be transferred that quickly? That is normally the way it works.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I would accept short, medium and long-term plans for capital investments, but you will still have a base price for each of those aspects at the time that you put forward the business case, and that will be based on today’s figure, with a potential inflationary rise over a few years. That is the way that it would be done commercially, so I would be very grateful if you could provide that information.
Douglas Lumsden has some questions, and then I will bring in the deputy convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I am delighted that these regulations are being brought forward. I remember that it was an issue that we wrestled with many years ago, when I was a member of this committee, and I think that this is the right move.
With regard to how you have sorted out the finance, why did you decide that the split would be that the council salary would still be paid by, presumably, the council and that only the adjusted MSP salary would be be paid by the Parliament? Surely the councils are the ones that are short of money and the one that could bear the cost is the Scottish Parliament.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Edward Mountain
My question is more on the mechanics of it, convener. I do not know the answer to this, but, if someone is an MP and then gets elected as an MSP, I presume that they will go straight on to being able to employ staff as an MSP, who might also be the staff they are employing as an MP. Have you considered that? Will guidance on that be issued between the two Parliaments? There could be a period in which the MSP and MP are employing the same staff. You are solving one issue, minister, but have you thought about solving the other? Or does it not happen? I do not know the answer to that, but I am sure that you will have looked at it.