The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
Thank you, cabinet secretary, for attending what has probably been your shortest meeting at a committee for a long time, with as few questions as you could probably hope for.
10:04 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
I have just remembered what Monica Lennon wanted to ask you, so I will defer my question so as not to tread on her toes, until I see whether she has asked it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
I apologise profusely.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
It is difficult, Monica. We are talking about the design and construction of ferries. If you want to put that question to Pentland Ferries, I suggest that this particular session might not be the place to do so.
Helen Inkster and Gordon Ross have made it clear that safety will be designed into their boats as a prerequisite, because their passengers are important. I am happy to let you develop the point outwith this session, but I think that you are pushing on an area that I am not sure is relevant to this part.
10:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
As we will be reporting on the outcome of the instrument, I seek the committee’s authority to delegate to me, as convener, the authority to approve the draft and report on its publication to the Parliament. Are members content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
Perfect. I thank the minister and her officials for their time.
09:56 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
Okay. You mentioned that, and I am interested in it. I know that CalMac is looking to charge islanders for delivering parcels from third parties such as Amazon to islands with a low number of inhabitants. CalMac suggests that it would cost it a quarter of a million pounds every year to provide that service to islanders on islands such as Raasay, rather than making a lorry go across with one package. Are you saying that you would view that as part of being in the community?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
Agenda item 7 is consideration of a negative instrument. As the instrument has been laid under the negative procedure, its provisions will come into force unless the Parliament agrees a motion to annul them. No such motion has been lodged.
Do members have any comments?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
Helen Inkster, will you plead the fifth on that as well?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Edward Mountain
So, having identified the passenger need and the demand for the service, you both went ahead and designed a boat. The reason that I am pushing slightly on this issue is that I watched the design process for 801 and 802; it was done by CalMac, and then it went up to CMAL and then to Transport Scotland. Those bodies have all had a measure of involvement in the process and they have all changed the demands slightly, so we have ended up with a ferry that has more capacity for passengers than has ever been used on that route previously and a demand for vehicles on one particular service that probably exists for only 10 per cent of the year. Meanwhile, you have gone for smaller, more flexible designs that can be ramped up or down as required.
Do you think that the Government procurement process for ferries is cumbersome? Is that the way in which ferries in Scotland should be built in the future?