The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5973 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I believe that Mercedes Villalba is going to speak to and move Rhoda Grant’s amendment 356 and speak to the other amendments in the group. Over to you, Mercedes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I should have welcomed Tim Eagle at the start of the meeting; I know that you will forgive me for that omission, Tim. I ask you to speak to amendment 486 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I welcome Ross Greer to the committee, as I think that this is the first time that he has spoken in the committee on this subject. I call Ross to speak to amendment 466 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Abstentions
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 5, Abstentions 1.
Amendment 466 disagreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I will make a couple of comments before I call on the cabinet secretary to speak.
I am struggling to see why amendments 356 and 357, which relate to crofting, are required, as crofting has a fairly easy and understood way of purchasing land and determining the value of crofting land. The situation with common grazing becomes more complicated, as the common grazings might not be attached to people who are active crofters. The common grazings may be held by active crofters and non-active crofters. I think that those two amendments would add confusion.
I think that the cabinet secretary will be bringing forward a crofting bill, and my suggestion is that, if change is wanted to the multitude of pieces of crofting legislation, the place for that is in that legislation, rather than in the bill that is before us. I would be interested to hear what the cabinet secretary says on that.
I understand what Mark Ruskell is trying to achieve though amendment 355, but I do not understand the mechanical way of achieving it—in particular, giving a right to buy and determining whether to value the land based on the percentage that is unused or on the percentage that is used, which could penalise somebody who might only be able to use a percentage less than 50 per cent. How would that affect their property rights?
I am also concerned that we went through the whole of the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill knowing that there was a consultation on the right to buy, which had not been fed in before we considered amendments to the right to buy in the bill. I think that that is flawed.
I am keen to hear what the cabinet secretary has to say. Now is your moment, cabinet secretary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I ask Mark Ruskell to wind up and press or withdraw amendment 355.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Bob Doris wants to speak at this stage.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 470 disagreed to.
Amendments 471, 473 to 475 and 477 not moved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Right; good. I had a question in my mind about whether we would move on to debate the next section of the bill, but there would then be a series of 10 votes that would take us beyond our 13:30 deadline, which would be unfair on members who are getting ready to speak in the chamber this afternoon. So, disappointingly for those who are in the swing of this and were ready to push on further and faster with the amendments, I will call a halt.
I remind members that, with the approval of the Parliamentary Bureau, we will be back here at 17:45 tomorrow evening for the next set of amendments. I will see you then.
Meeting closed at 13:20.