The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6299 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I now ask Tim Eagle to speak to amendment 218 and any other amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
I call amendment 501, in the name of Emma Harper, already debated with amendment 528. Emma Harper to move or not move.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Ms Harper. I am giving you a bit of leeway this evening. I am usually quite strict about members saying only whether they are moving or not moving an amendment. You have got your comment there, and we will not need to do that again. I encourage members not to do that.
Amendment 502 not moved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
We have got to where we needed to get to this evening so I will now pause stage 2 proceedings for today. We will continue our consideration on Tuesday 24 June. It is still my aim to complete stage 2 in time to meet the end of June deadline. I warn members who wish to contribute that we will start at 8.40 on Tuesday. Mr Ewing, it will, as always, be delightful to see you, even if you are only virtual at that stage.
With that, I close the meeting.
Meeting closed at 19:46.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
As noted in the correction to the groupings, the next group is on natural capital investment. Due to the order of the marshalled list of amendments, the group on Crown rights to foreshore and seabed will follow this group. Amendment 478, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is the only amendment in the group. I call Rachael Hamilton to move and speak to amendment 478.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
You will get a chance to wind up at the end, Monica. Michael, do you want to come in at this stage?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Abstentions
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Stewart, Kevin (Aberdeen Central) (SNP)
Abstentions
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 483 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Edward Mountain
The question is, that amendment 468—amendment 486, that is; I am starting to get my numbers muddled up very early on in this session. I will need to sharpen up. The question is, that amendment 486 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.